From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753536AbdGUHyt (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jul 2017 03:54:49 -0400 Received: from regular1.263xmail.com ([211.150.99.139]:47546 "EHLO regular1.263xmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752009AbdGUHys (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jul 2017 03:54:48 -0400 X-263anti-spam: KSV:0;BIG:0; X-MAIL-GRAY: 0 X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 1 X-KSVirus-check: 0 X-ADDR-CHECKED: 0 X-ABS-CHECKED: 1 X-SKE-CHECKED: 1 X-ANTISPAM-LEVEL: 2 X-RL-SENDER: xxm@rock-chips.com X-FST-TO: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-SENDER-IP: 58.22.7.114 X-LOGIN-NAME: xxm@rock-chips.com X-UNIQUE-TAG: X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0 X-DNS-TYPE: 0 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] iommu/rockchip: add multi irqs support To: Heiko Stuebner Cc: Joerg Roedel , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1500618430-114821-1-git-send-email-xxm@rock-chips.com> <1500618430-114821-2-git-send-email-xxm@rock-chips.com> <5666211.VjCXUuunyU@phil> From: xxm Message-ID: <675fd7bf-7551-4f95-9b9c-8a2151e59ee1@rock-chips.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 15:54:40 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5666211.VjCXUuunyU@phil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Heiko, On 07/21/2017 03:07 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Am Freitag, 21. Juli 2017, 14:27:09 CEST schrieb Simon Xue: >> From: Simon >> >> RK3368 vpu mmu have two irqs, this patch support multi irqs >> >> Signed-off-by: Simon >> --- >> changes since V1: >> - use devm_kcalloc instead of devm_kzalloc when alloc irq array >> >> drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c >> index 4ba48a2..3c462c0 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c >> @@ -90,7 +90,8 @@ struct rk_iommu { >> struct device *dev; >> void __iomem **bases; >> int num_mmu; >> - int irq; >> + int *irq; >> + int num_irq; >> struct iommu_device iommu; >> struct list_head node; /* entry in rk_iommu_domain.iommus */ >> struct iommu_domain *domain; /* domain to which iommu is attached */ >> @@ -825,10 +826,12 @@ static int rk_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, >> >> iommu->domain = domain; >> >> - ret = devm_request_irq(iommu->dev, iommu->irq, rk_iommu_irq, >> - IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev), iommu); >> - if (ret) >> - return ret; >> + for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_irq; i++) { >> + ret = devm_request_irq(iommu->dev, iommu->irq[i], rk_iommu_irq, >> + IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev), iommu); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + } >> >> for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_mmu; i++) { >> rk_iommu_write(iommu->bases[i], RK_MMU_DTE_ADDR, >> @@ -878,7 +881,8 @@ static void rk_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, >> } >> rk_iommu_disable_stall(iommu); >> >> - devm_free_irq(iommu->dev, iommu->irq, iommu); >> + for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_irq; i++) >> + devm_free_irq(iommu->dev, iommu->irq[i], iommu); >> >> iommu->domain = NULL; >> >> @@ -1157,10 +1161,20 @@ static int rk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> if (iommu->num_mmu == 0) >> return PTR_ERR(iommu->bases[0]); >> >> - iommu->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); >> - if (iommu->irq < 0) { >> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ, %d\n", iommu->irq); >> - return -ENXIO; >> + while (platform_get_irq(pdev, iommu->num_irq) >= 0) >> + iommu->num_irq++; > Hmm, this could also result in a iommu having 0 irqs if wrongly > configured and probe would still suceed. This sounds somehow > wrong to me. > > But I'm not sure if there is precedent on how to handle a variable > number of interrupts correctly somewhere. How about add a judgement for iommu->num_irq ? like this: if (!iommu->num_irq) return -ENOXIO; > > Heiko > >> + >> + iommu->irq = devm_kcalloc(dev, iommu->num_irq, sizeof(*iommu->irq), >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!iommu->irq) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_irq; i++) { >> + iommu->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i); >> + if (iommu->irq[i] < 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ, %d\n", iommu->irq[i]); >> + return -ENXIO; >> + } >> } >> >> err = iommu_device_sysfs_add(&iommu->iommu, dev, NULL, dev_name(dev)); >> > > > >