linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Mike Anderson <andmike@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:48:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <680bb92e-66eb-8959-88a5-3447a6a282c8@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190718032858.28744-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>

On 7/17/19 10:28 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This version is mostly about splitting up patch 2/3 into three separate
> patches, as suggested by Christoph Hellwig. Two other changes are a fix in
> patch 1 which wasn't selecting ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT for s390 spotted by
> Janani and removal of sme_active and sev_active symbol exports as suggested
> by Christoph Hellwig.
> 
> These patches are applied on top of today's dma-mapping/for-next.
> 
> I don't have a way to test SME, SEV, nor s390's PEF so the patches have only
> been build tested.

I'll try and get this tested quickly to be sure everything works for SME
and SEV.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> Changelog
> 
> Since v2:
> 
> - Patch "x86,s390: Move ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT definition to arch/Kconfig"
>   - Added "select ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT" to config S390. Suggested by Janani.
> 
> - Patch "DMA mapping: Move SME handling to x86-specific files"
>   - Split up into 3 new patches. Suggested by Christoph Hellwig.
> 
> - Patch "swiotlb: Remove call to sme_active()"
>   - New patch.
> 
> - Patch "dma-mapping: Remove dma_check_mask()"
>   - New patch.
> 
> - Patch "x86,s390/mm: Move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86-specific header"
>   - New patch.
>   - Removed export of sme_active symbol. Suggested by Christoph Hellwig.
> 
> - Patch "fs/core/vmcore: Move sev_active() reference to x86 arch code"
>   - Removed export of sev_active symbol. Suggested by Christoph Hellwig.
> 
> - Patch "s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function"
>   - New patch.
> 
> Since v1:
> 
> - Patch "x86,s390: Move ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT definition to arch/Kconfig"
>   - Remove definition of ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT from s390/Kconfig as well.
>   - Reworded patch title and message a little bit.
> 
> - Patch "DMA mapping: Move SME handling to x86-specific files"
>   - Adapt s390's <asm/mem_encrypt.h> as well.
>   - Remove dma_check_mask() from kernel/dma/mapping.c. Suggested by
>     Christoph Hellwig.
> 
> Thiago Jung Bauermann (6):
>   x86,s390: Move ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT definition to arch/Kconfig
>   swiotlb: Remove call to sme_active()
>   dma-mapping: Remove dma_check_mask()
>   x86,s390/mm: Move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86-specific header
>   fs/core/vmcore: Move sev_active() reference to x86 arch code
>   s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function
> 
>  arch/Kconfig                        |  3 +++
>  arch/s390/Kconfig                   |  4 +---
>  arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h |  5 +----
>  arch/s390/mm/init.c                 |  8 +-------
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                    |  4 +---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h  | 10 ++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/crash_dump_64.c     |  5 +++++
>  arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c           |  2 --
>  fs/proc/vmcore.c                    |  8 ++++----
>  include/linux/crash_dump.h          | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mem_encrypt.h         | 15 +--------------
>  kernel/dma/mapping.c                |  8 --------
>  kernel/dma/swiotlb.c                |  3 +--
>  13 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-18 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-18  3:28 [PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18  3:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] x86,s390: Move ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT definition to arch/Kconfig Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18  3:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] swiotlb: Remove call to sme_active() Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18  8:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:26   ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-18  3:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] dma-mapping: Remove dma_check_mask() Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18  8:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:29   ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-18  3:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] x86,s390/mm: Move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86-specific header Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18  8:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:42   ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-18 17:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18  3:28 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] fs/core/vmcore: Move sev_active() reference to x86 arch code Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18  8:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:47   ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-19  4:59     ` lijiang
2019-07-19 15:47       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18  3:28 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18  8:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 13:01     ` Halil Pasic
2019-07-18 16:43       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 16:41     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 17:48 ` Lendacky, Thomas [this message]
2019-07-18 19:44   ` [PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-19 13:12     ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-19 15:45       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=680bb92e-66eb-8959-88a5-3447a6a282c8@amd.com \
    --to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=andmike@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).