From: "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Mike Anderson <andmike@linux.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:48:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <680bb92e-66eb-8959-88a5-3447a6a282c8@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190718032858.28744-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
On 7/17/19 10:28 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This version is mostly about splitting up patch 2/3 into three separate
> patches, as suggested by Christoph Hellwig. Two other changes are a fix in
> patch 1 which wasn't selecting ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT for s390 spotted by
> Janani and removal of sme_active and sev_active symbol exports as suggested
> by Christoph Hellwig.
>
> These patches are applied on top of today's dma-mapping/for-next.
>
> I don't have a way to test SME, SEV, nor s390's PEF so the patches have only
> been build tested.
I'll try and get this tested quickly to be sure everything works for SME
and SEV.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> Changelog
>
> Since v2:
>
> - Patch "x86,s390: Move ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT definition to arch/Kconfig"
> - Added "select ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT" to config S390. Suggested by Janani.
>
> - Patch "DMA mapping: Move SME handling to x86-specific files"
> - Split up into 3 new patches. Suggested by Christoph Hellwig.
>
> - Patch "swiotlb: Remove call to sme_active()"
> - New patch.
>
> - Patch "dma-mapping: Remove dma_check_mask()"
> - New patch.
>
> - Patch "x86,s390/mm: Move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86-specific header"
> - New patch.
> - Removed export of sme_active symbol. Suggested by Christoph Hellwig.
>
> - Patch "fs/core/vmcore: Move sev_active() reference to x86 arch code"
> - Removed export of sev_active symbol. Suggested by Christoph Hellwig.
>
> - Patch "s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function"
> - New patch.
>
> Since v1:
>
> - Patch "x86,s390: Move ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT definition to arch/Kconfig"
> - Remove definition of ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT from s390/Kconfig as well.
> - Reworded patch title and message a little bit.
>
> - Patch "DMA mapping: Move SME handling to x86-specific files"
> - Adapt s390's <asm/mem_encrypt.h> as well.
> - Remove dma_check_mask() from kernel/dma/mapping.c. Suggested by
> Christoph Hellwig.
>
> Thiago Jung Bauermann (6):
> x86,s390: Move ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT definition to arch/Kconfig
> swiotlb: Remove call to sme_active()
> dma-mapping: Remove dma_check_mask()
> x86,s390/mm: Move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86-specific header
> fs/core/vmcore: Move sev_active() reference to x86 arch code
> s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function
>
> arch/Kconfig | 3 +++
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 4 +---
> arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 5 +----
> arch/s390/mm/init.c | 8 +-------
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 +---
> arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 10 ++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/crash_dump_64.c | 5 +++++
> arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 2 --
> fs/proc/vmcore.c | 8 ++++----
> include/linux/crash_dump.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mem_encrypt.h | 15 +--------------
> kernel/dma/mapping.c | 8 --------
> kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 3 +--
> 13 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-18 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-18 3:28 [PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] x86,s390: Move ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT definition to arch/Kconfig Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] swiotlb: Remove call to sme_active() Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 8:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:26 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] dma-mapping: Remove dma_check_mask() Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 8:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:29 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] x86,s390/mm: Move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86-specific header Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 8:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:42 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-18 17:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] fs/core/vmcore: Move sev_active() reference to x86 arch code Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 8:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 17:47 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-19 4:59 ` lijiang
2019-07-19 15:47 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 3:28 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 8:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-18 13:01 ` Halil Pasic
2019-07-18 16:43 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 16:41 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-18 17:48 ` Lendacky, Thomas [this message]
2019-07-18 19:44 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-07-19 13:12 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-07-19 15:45 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=680bb92e-66eb-8959-88a5-3447a6a282c8@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=andmike@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).