From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753346AbcHUTva (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:51:30 -0400
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:55681 "EHLO mout.web.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752998AbcHUTv2 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:51:28 -0400
Subject: Re: IB/core: Fine-tuning for ib_is_udata_cleared()
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
        Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>,
        Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>
References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
 <f7bb3caf-81cd-fba9-afc8-5fac72b8a4b3@users.sourceforge.net>
 <1471802623.3746.1.camel@perches.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <683187e0-2e6a-88c0-f87a-9c5f0489370a@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:51:09 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1471802623.3746.1.camel@perches.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ZeVLilU4wsWPZl6vwE7AWy/jfx1AdpMilfSMEaAKU3cGnYPUwte
 GOM/YAbp9UegdiIhuJ/bWPNzkj98vijQPk03BQogUmLlrSc3QXCe8gL3VBAOSiBi/ebj/l9
 S7k4hBlQXe1fIsTgNO2VC6cQ/78oQ9M7+HS1CfwQBIQeDPa1996G2xqBpwnji4R6wx5hGIm
 uipXsmP5it9aGac/UbEqA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Dh83Qw3AJHg=:L0AuxSrdx0dMdfQv8C288y
 ckHJxe40wBm7Rx+ul2dXGWSG6KWU49IWRW0ypB6352N7aaPbQuST1+x4m4jgHQrLIZLDeNZ6b
 /HAJVUSCcyXZN3xKGSij5AoT31bDDY73WOz4ZNL7Z+2LNZECjPUDoFc+ZQdZwUu/x/3MP9Yx8
 h7N7cCUSivsmzwE7PFvpxAB99pvHxSnLnWshworp1v0yRRO+SMQ1JixwWa0Ulqn902SnnIOol
 Kd6GvfTERf/nzaXSPgKz9FauQYPDR84NilaBDOVcLCfgeSbOnLpOgL92R1HKULPUri8L2VDH3
 +BRwVEFROmDRQt9ecyh3W8gUpg5hd2YqZehDOOl9sb9Uo1jkrWW67PFoMV6sReJcm7zcqoybS
 bEOQ9PrTzhGC39V8i0HpFEFSiKduABxdJX+VQZBIy16Ap4aYmvUfDxjfki5Bd7mRdH+nLuaRm
 giUxahDjl/uSQhMDE2zcFS/tSQE4/wQJRgveaOY1JljXFFDwF21HRuNMwHoUr3d46O9VOLNHv
 KTv2nKg9sNHQY8Ow0QVKFQox5tstkZaz26WFq6gXtD6OGpRl/WnTrrRtpQYUMD/cZvVD5yvgu
 0OaUVVO4GVzD7TCghaE35ai6OMdvwwJ4CsAm/6Kz6+04JHOEIMzV9vSH6oXEscL60bFSviWdI
 uauwLNv3w/PhXiACeQE3g/IdniKjytZmhHm0BjkUwlPCgbPggjluemwZFCeW8Uv2XBRyc+NmN
 8qlheRlGSEaWTW3LbVhVQtr2suWdRUhx6a1bs3m9h6EOXcHnBrqmcSR5Jr//1+pIBmR/y/esc
 taMrV0M
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

>> A few update suggestions were taken into account
>> from static source code analysis.
> 
> Don't introduce a defect in patch 1 and correct
> that introduced defect in patch 2.

Which detail do you not like here?


> This should be a single patch.

Do any more software software developers would like to get
the proposed changes in a single update step?

Regards,
Markus