linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: perf does not resolve plt symbols from libstdc++ right (.plt.sec problem)
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:09:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <68eb3576-66dd-9155-aae2-b3cde1ebcbdf@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6980662-bf74-1d48-831e-ca1d7209ca2f@suse.cz>

Any ideas on this?

On 11. 01. 21, 7:31, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this e-mails is a follow-up of my report at:
> https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180681
> 
> There is a problem with *@plt symbols in some libraries, they are 
> unresolved by perf (memcmp@plt in this case):
>  >     0.26%  main2    /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.28            0xa51a0 
>             l [.] 0x00000000000a51a0
> 
> On the other hand, plt symbols in other libraries are fine (memset@plt 
> in this case):
>  >     0.17%  main2    /usr/lib64/libantlr4-runtime.so.4.8       0x4ed10 
>             l [.] memset@plt
> 
> I dumped memcmp's .plt.rela entries in perf:
> /usr/lib64/libantlr4-runtime.so.4.8: 154th addr=4e9d0 plt_off=4e020 
> hdr=10 entry=10
> /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.28: 772th addr=a1070 plt_off=9e020 hdr=10 
> entry=10
> 
> The difference (offset) of stdc++'s memcmp is 0xa51a0 (correct) - 
> 0xa1070 (perf's computed) = 0x4130.
> 
> The problem is perf assumes nth entry of .plt.rela to correspond to nth 
> function in .plt, but memcmp is in .plt.sec in libstdc++.so:
> 
>  > Relocation section '.rela.plt' at offset 0x97900 contains 1018 entries:
>  >     Offset             Info             Type               Symbol's 
> Value  Symbol's Name + Addend
>  > ...
>  > 00000000001dc838  0000007800000007 R_X86_64_JUMP_SLOT 
> 0000000000000000 memcmp@GLIBC_2.2.5 + 0
> 
> Perf does this with the rela entries:
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/f5e6c330254ae691f6d7befe61c786eb5056007e/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c#L385 
> 
> 
> It takes a symbol index from sym.r_info. Then it resolves its name from 
> .dynsym, appending "@plt" to it. Then this name is added to perf's 
> symbol table along with address which is computed as .rela.plt index 
> multiplied by entry size (shdr_plt.sh_entsize) plus plt header 
> (shdr_plt.sh_entsize on x86_64 too).
> 
> And from this comes (almost) the offset above:
>  > $ objdump -h /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6|grep -E ' .plt(\.sec)? '
>  >  12 .plt          00003fb0  000000000009e020  000000000009e020 
> 0009e020  2**4
>  >  14 .plt.sec      00003fa0  00000000000a2160  00000000000a2160 
> 000a2160  2**4
> 
> 0xa2160-0x9e020 = 0x4140. I assume the 0x10 difference is that perf adds 
> shdr_plt.sh_entsize (0x10) to the offset to skip the first .plt entry 
> (header).
> 
> Richard writes:
> ======
> .plt.sec is IIRC the "second" (sec) PLT entry - the one that will be 
> used on the second call (and on).  This is used / emitted for ELF object 
> instrumented for Intel CET.  The details escape me for the moment but I 
> hope the x86 ABI documents this (and the constraints) in detail.
> ======
> 
> How should perf find out whether to consider .plt or .plt.sec? Or 
> generally, how to properly find an address of *@plt symbols like 
> memcmp@plt above?
> 
> thanks,


-- 
js
suse labs

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-29  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-11  6:31 perf does not resolve plt symbols from libstdc++ right (.plt.sec problem) Jiri Slaby
2021-03-29  9:09 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2021-03-29  9:38   ` Richard Biener
2021-03-29 12:52     ` H.J. Lu
2021-03-29 13:06       ` Richard Biener
2021-03-29 13:10         ` H.J. Lu
2021-03-31  6:56           ` Jiri Slaby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=68eb3576-66dd-9155-aae2-b3cde1ebcbdf@suse.cz \
    --to=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).