From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268322AbTGIOFv (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:05:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268325AbTGIOFv (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:05:51 -0400 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:16108 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268322AbTGIOFu (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:05:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 07:20:11 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: gigag@bezeqint.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Known problems for 3.5/0.5 virtual space split??? Message-ID: <69110000.1057760411@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I wonder if there are any known problems for applying > 2.4.21rc8aa1 patch from Andrea? > > I'm trying to boot a Xeon 2.4 box with 4GB of RAM, IDE CD and > Adaptec AIC7XXX SCSI devices. > > I compile the kernel with 1/3 split and it boots OK. When I simply > change the split to 3.5/0.5, it gets stuck during the boot not being > able to mount root partition. > > Any ideas? Any other working kernel/patch configurations for h/w > like I have? Odd - should work. Post a boot log (use a serial console). Also, if you can try 2.5-mjb tree, that should have a forward port of the same concept ... does it work there? M.