From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226EDC07E99 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 18:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0300361601 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 18:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230081AbhGHSPu (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:15:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43234 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229650AbhGHSPs (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:15:48 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBF57C061574 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 11:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id w13so5585344qtc.0 for ; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 11:13:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vt-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:cc :date:message-id:references:to; bh=nz61/2ipllgpvLpgCGgX7r1d8pgsxg1IoMqza7C5vTI=; b=CcXG3sVPOSKXoFF+gaKVYgWrb8DR1EijPlJrLmlONIiTDa4P2vT11TLlDFjg69+uPt QHsex7kF/9kXGYrMJyOh/ab2f13XBz/jktm0MTRyl4eBUQiYh1UWGZXRDWEIN6YN7Up8 SRsVYZPe3EvshEITV376tINcoQP64hpMURWixn3JcJdLQbRyAhSdTTGYZKt7lO3GX1IQ ux6X4oh/b8cl2YnLV6xgqpm/h5xJXm66Z9TqYoiqMfDHNaRDJ2IFs37Q7EUwVL6HRIpO S1Jg/KOIkgiNy5RZO2uOu1sitvNnHg3/b7d4pa5Pels9Gu76hSw+nd/mDHOMDb+JzuFM 5TAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :from:in-reply-to:cc:date:message-id:references:to; bh=nz61/2ipllgpvLpgCGgX7r1d8pgsxg1IoMqza7C5vTI=; b=FxXECTPIv0ZtO5d7/IzZpmmANFNLAsZZ+ln3UHPyHyDUjt2w4R+LnmTtj7ODjxyT6g fcIADWIsyEUvbt99jWq/thWguvl5dJnAT5Kcaur9gHPhK+hytq4POoDMwDipqBD2znvk TeDAANSmO5I5xTwreQchHbIAQyqC+XuaigWRSrf9+CqPFWJatnflyxBJamOrhSP3Ctkq b1c/eI/PuFVMUAv7KNfKVa02KJUsx8HJ3Ol6oJPpVix8TwPWVjBi/y2woZDu8FShFbQu NGvfxXb1yvO0By8VsNQvFt0n6vO+hsaAIHIqFglM/Zj7+FMyKI0NpFOwt8ipKWg5PYgf uUnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5319YIB+PmAqQjEd/UUNidmjDqgbnrZdPZrZd2iszG5IDyy8npG8 t3uCbhpu0SKLkAQsNwjVYcnq+w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxsKhx6k4o/ZjQtYmK/8qame8teaN4j1+lWv0q+KTN5pW0nVqWR8OgdwYOLslpoaE3pEYXJcg== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4b69:: with SMTP id g9mr23819103qts.123.1625767983994; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 11:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple ([50.225.136.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l6sm1330221qkk.117.2021.07.08.11.13.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Jul 2021 11:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] drivers: parisc: Remove unnecessary #if blocks From: bilbao@vt.edu In-Reply-To: Cc: James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, Joe Perches , deller@gmx.de, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:13:02 -0400 Message-Id: <695234B5-445C-43F8-A438-29D644A56291@vt.edu> References: To: Andrew Lunn X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18F72) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Andrew, following your suggestions I will just abandon this and resubm= it next week with proper Subjects, etc.=20 > On Jul 8, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 01:40:54PM -0400, Carlos Bilbao wrote: >> Remove undefined #ifdefs and #if 0 from these two files. >=20 > Hi Carlos >=20 > This is not a network driver, so putting net-next in the subject is > not useful. >=20 > Also, at the moment, we are in the merge window. It is unlikely that > any maintainer will accept your patches until the merge window closes, > which should be this weekend. You can whoever still send patches, but > please mark them RFC, and send them just to the appropriate list, not > the maintainer. >=20 > Andrew