From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 16:25:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 16:25:19 -0400 Received: from mx.adelphiacom.com ([24.48.58.197]:50855 "EHLO mx.adelphiacom.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 16:25:10 -0400 Message-ID: <69DCAE8DF2BFD411AACC0002A50A63F005BB935A@cdptex1.adelphiacom.com> From: Sam James To: "Albert D. Cahalan" , tao@acc.umu.se Cc: phillips@bonn-fries.net, sct@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: intermediate summary of ext3-2.4-0.9.4 thread Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 16:25:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >This is just completely true. One wonders why we seem to enjoy >getting screwed this way. We shouldn't be patching these MTAs or >hacking Linux to act like BSD. We should be avoiding these MTAs. > >Somebody can create a big MTA list, listing the good and bad ones. >Then we get the Linux-hostile MTAs out of the Linux distributions, >demanding compliance like we do for filesystem layout. We also hunt >down Linux-related web pages that mention these MTAs and get the >pages changed or removed. The point is to make these MTAs just >disappear, never to be seen again. Nice MTAs get promoted. Your not related to Bill Gates are you?