From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
To: mark.rutland@arm.com
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, broonie@kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, songmuchun@bytedance.com,
qirui.001@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64/ftrace: Make function graph use ftrace directly
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 10:26:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69edba11-6d15-b80a-5840-86834101f76d@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220322104956.42203163@gandalf.local.home>
On 2022/3/22 22:49, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 22:14:11 +0800
> Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> wrote:
>
>>> You deleted ftrace_graph_caller above from entry-ftrace.S, if we can get
>>> here with some options, wouldn't that break the build?
>>
>> The above ftrace_graph_caller deleted is only for CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS,
>> and I tried using a low gcc version that doesn't select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS,
>> it can build success.
>
> OK, I didn't look too deep into this.
>
> I don't have an issue with this patch, but it needs to go through the arm64
> tree.
Hi Mark, would you mind picking this up for arm64 tree?
Thanks.
>
> -- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-24 9:32 [PATCH v3 1/3] ftrace: cleanup ftrace_graph_caller enable and disable Chengming Zhou
2022-02-24 9:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/ftrace: cleanup graph tracer Chengming Zhou
2022-02-24 9:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64/ftrace: Make function graph use ftrace directly Chengming Zhou
2022-03-22 12:48 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-03-22 13:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-22 14:14 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
2022-03-22 14:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-07 2:26 ` Chengming Zhou [this message]
2022-04-07 8:58 ` Mark Brown
2022-04-07 12:39 ` Chengming Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69edba11-6d15-b80a-5840-86834101f76d@bytedance.com \
--to=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=qirui.001@bytedance.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).