From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752054AbdK1NDt (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:03:49 -0500 Received: from mail.micronovasrl.com ([212.103.203.10]:57210 "EHLO mail.micronovasrl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751555AbdK1NDr (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:03:47 -0500 Authentication-Results: mail.micronovasrl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=micronovasrl.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Cedrus driver From: Giulio Benetti X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15B202) In-Reply-To: <20171128125203.h7cnu3gkfmogqhxu@flea.home> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:03:43 +0100 Cc: Thomas van Kleef , Hans Verkuil , Andreas Baierl , linux-sunxi , linux@armlinux.org.uk, wens@csie.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <6A617A27-DBE8-4537-A122-6ACA98B8A6B4@micronovasrl.com> References: <1511868558-1962148761.366cc20c7e@prakkezator.vehosting.nl> <20171128125203.h7cnu3gkfmogqhxu@flea.home> To: Maxime Ripard Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by nfs id vASD3snm015459 Hi, > Il giorno 28 nov 2017, alle ore 13:52, Maxime Ripard ha scritto: > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:54:08PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote: >>>>> Should I be working in sunxi-next I wonder? >>>> >>>> Yes, this is the best way, cedrus is very specific to sunxi. >>>> So before working on mainline, I think the best is to work un sunxi-next branch. >>> >>> Is the requests2 api in sunxi-next? >> >> It should be there, >> take a look at latest commit of yesterday: >> https://github.com/linux-sunxi/linux-sunxi/commit/df7cacd062cd84c551d7e72f15b1af6d71abc198 > > No, it shouldn't. sunxi-next is about patches that are related to > sunxi that have been accepted in their respective maintainers' > branches. > > While we could argue about the first criteria, the second one is not > respected. > > And really, just develop against 4.14. sunxi-next is rebased, and it's > just not something you can base some work on. Where do we can work on then? Should Thomas setup his own github repo? What about the one you’ve set up @free-electrons? > > Maxime > > -- > Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > http://free-electrons.com