From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 16 May 2001 11:12:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 16 May 2001 11:11:50 -0400 Received: from comverse-in.com ([38.150.222.2]:51198 "EHLO eagle.comverse-in.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 16 May 2001 11:11:40 -0400 Message-ID: <6B1DF6EEBA51D31182F200902740436802678ED1@mail-in.comverse-in.com> From: "Khachaturov, Vassilii" To: "'H. Peter Anvin'" , Alan Cox Cc: Chip Salzenberg , Linus Torvalds , Neil Brown , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List , viro@math.psu.edu Subject: RE: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 11:06:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Well, even if you spank the future violators, what about the current overlaps? E.g., the CD-ROM ioctls are overlapping with the STREAMS ioctls (the latter ones used by LiS and honored by glibc). V. > -----Original Message----- > From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:hpa@transmeta.com] > Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > 1. is of course a problem in itself. Someone who creates > overlapping > > > ioctls should be spanked, hard. > > > > No argument there. But there is no LANANA ioctl body > > > > I though Michael Chastain was maintaining this set. No, we > haven't made > it an official LANANA function, mostly because I didn't want to push.