From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32744C54EE9 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231969AbiI0QT0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 12:19:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58120 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232320AbiI0QTY (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 12:19:24 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6FF51C8881 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id hy2so21758192ejc.8 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:19:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=wtuYP/U8JcCds+Y8vgYt3RNPN+IvgKtQC+pNVMQXjHw=; b=VPLGTAFsQ9vqWDNFPxTFeBhouiEHc5CpVWDjOnwMbJMnR2o39RyG6YtrR3o28npFwP RvPNVrmMcTHfxXqqprE1I5VtYa7YQ60pF98aTQ8Tb1SpBkupjZZ3QaLsxKYxN/WKSVCj 07MJxNSBzx+dfnRsdbHVHytZBHXt3PW0m9HY68qnzjB3XE88/WUY7A5Cm2UaC45QUkq0 bxmwyOugjFh4VMs0Pm9Fd3npFFxpLLX9ipH7sCscaAPU/MUnbSrbBpX4xo0ZwCo89NNN HYrWeJGzdTh3nQOQUfJhcISoeetoY9O8jd7mn23F7GWhydPmwRhsEH7Sv81uCEYHJA4V UG4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=wtuYP/U8JcCds+Y8vgYt3RNPN+IvgKtQC+pNVMQXjHw=; b=YA6wuMrsIn6RoGvlPEYyRHUt56I96M4oMP/iiCnMIWqbNE/EX1z9JUJi77MDLEVxgS q4bbvOJBzP+YXoOW+dVtBKUASCzqL/vLhHSAolM6+4DohpSBVq+cdO5ZLxheTvPwUnnB JLy/hHjn5G7UxbEFAIvYZC1RKFx7mhFO7CFMZziNg/zynCLQnN/A5ki1YWWeco8nxIB4 jiUKEf8AMxpRGxRCbmdYkDi+PAh9Oo2fzbJThC+miANGsEGPjTfuUYW2pF8Gtql9OsjO KgXkU6Pfjd/CzYORFDj1yBmSGB3TeEDz0Iv80ciaskd7Vi2gw3L73e+KLuKOgTH4nsEY PQWw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3kf5xFayGXF7rorxD3uBK9R7c9cfvc4nVDdBQt5lriEkfC+B4q zyOFFQklhtnIsPRKn8dfbaGQHA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM72s9GjR424MSP071Z2GqS/d2ATvAkbBHFTQyGzmNysECeWNT9rATKse5Hkg/ENGXsjfefBeg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:62a1:b0:781:b320:90c0 with SMTP id nd33-20020a17090762a100b00781b32090c0mr22413279ejc.255.1664295560374; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:19:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mbp-di-paolo.station (net-2-37-207-44.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [2.37.207.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b18-20020a17090630d200b00780982d77d1sm974784ejb.154.2022.09.27.09.19.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:19:19 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: [patch v11 5/6] block, bfq: cleanup bfq_weights_tree add/remove apis From: Paolo Valente In-Reply-To: <20220919084633.nmzastqkjool5jnc@quack3> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 18:19:18 +0200 Cc: Yu Kuai , tj@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6E987AC9-9EBD-4172-A440-2FC13BA9AFD1@linaro.org> References: <20220916071942.214222-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> <20220916071942.214222-6-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> <20220919084633.nmzastqkjool5jnc@quack3> To: Jan Kara X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Il giorno 19 set 2022, alle ore 10:46, Jan Kara ha = scritto: >=20 > On Fri 16-09-22 15:19:41, Yu Kuai wrote: >> From: Yu Kuai >>=20 >> The 'bfq_data' and 'rb_root_cached' can both be accessed through >> 'bfq_queue', thus only pass 'bfq_queue' as parameter. >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai >=20 Thanks for keeping improving BFQ's code. Acked-by: Paolo Valente > Looks good. Feel free to add: >=20 > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara >=20 > Honza >> --- >> block/bfq-iosched.c | 19 +++++++++---------- >> block/bfq-iosched.h | 10 +++------- >> block/bfq-wf2q.c | 18 ++++++------------ >> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) >>=20 >> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c >> index 6d95b0e488a8..4ad4fa0dad4a 100644 >> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c >> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c >> @@ -870,9 +870,9 @@ static bool bfq_asymmetric_scenario(struct = bfq_data *bfqd, >> * In most scenarios, the rate at which nodes are created/destroyed >> * should be low too. >> */ >> -void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue = *bfqq, >> - struct rb_root_cached *root) >> +void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) >> { >> + struct rb_root_cached *root =3D &bfqq->bfqd->queue_weights_tree; >> struct bfq_entity *entity =3D &bfqq->entity; >> struct rb_node **new =3D &(root->rb_root.rb_node), *parent =3D = NULL; >> bool leftmost =3D true; >> @@ -944,13 +944,14 @@ void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data = *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, >> * See the comments to the function bfq_weights_tree_add() for = considerations >> * about overhead. >> */ >> -void __bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd, >> - struct bfq_queue *bfqq, >> - struct rb_root_cached *root) >> +void __bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) >> { >> + struct rb_root_cached *root; >> + >> if (!bfqq->weight_counter) >> return; >>=20 >> + root =3D &bfqq->bfqd->queue_weights_tree; >> bfqq->weight_counter->num_active--; >> if (bfqq->weight_counter->num_active > 0) >> goto reset_entity_pointer; >> @@ -967,11 +968,9 @@ void __bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data = *bfqd, >> * Invoke __bfq_weights_tree_remove on bfqq and decrement the number >> * of active groups for each queue's inactive parent entity. >> */ >> -void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd, >> - struct bfq_queue *bfqq) >> +void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) >> { >> - __bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, bfqq, >> - &bfqd->queue_weights_tree); >> + __bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqq); >> } >>=20 >> /* >> @@ -6220,7 +6219,7 @@ static void bfq_completed_request(struct = bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_data *bfqd) >> bfqq->budget_timeout =3D jiffies; >>=20 >> bfq_del_bfqq_in_groups_with_pending_reqs(bfqq); >> - bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, bfqq); >> + bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqq); >> } >>=20 >> now_ns =3D ktime_get_ns(); >> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h >> index 257acb54c6dc..4bb58ab0c90a 100644 >> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h >> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h >> @@ -973,13 +973,9 @@ struct bfq_queue *bic_to_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq = *bic, bool is_sync); >> void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bool = is_sync); >> struct bfq_data *bic_to_bfqd(struct bfq_io_cq *bic); >> void bfq_pos_tree_add_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue = *bfqq); >> -void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue = *bfqq, >> - struct rb_root_cached *root); >> -void __bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd, >> - struct bfq_queue *bfqq, >> - struct rb_root_cached *root); >> -void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd, >> - struct bfq_queue *bfqq); >> +void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_queue *bfqq); >> +void __bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_queue *bfqq); >> +void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_queue *bfqq); >> void bfq_bfqq_expire(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, >> bool compensate, enum bfqq_expiration reason); >> void bfq_put_queue(struct bfq_queue *bfqq); >> diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c >> index 5e8224c96921..124aaea6196e 100644 >> --- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c >> +++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c >> @@ -707,7 +707,6 @@ __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio(struct = bfq_service_tree *old_st, >> struct bfq_queue *bfqq =3D bfq_entity_to_bfqq(entity); >> unsigned int prev_weight, new_weight; >> struct bfq_data *bfqd =3D NULL; >> - struct rb_root_cached *root; >> #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED >> struct bfq_sched_data *sd; >> struct bfq_group *bfqg; >> @@ -770,19 +769,15 @@ __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio(struct = bfq_service_tree *old_st, >> * queue, remove the entity from its old weight counter = (if >> * there is a counter associated with the entity). >> */ >> - if (prev_weight !=3D new_weight && bfqq) { >> - root =3D &bfqd->queue_weights_tree; >> - __bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, bfqq, root); >> - } >> + if (prev_weight !=3D new_weight && bfqq) >> + __bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqq); >> entity->weight =3D new_weight; >> /* >> * Add the entity, if it is not a weight-raised queue, >> * to the counter associated with its new weight. >> */ >> - if (prev_weight !=3D new_weight && bfqq && = bfqq->wr_coeff =3D=3D 1) { >> - /* If we get here, root has been initialized. */ >> - bfq_weights_tree_add(bfqd, bfqq, root); >> - } >> + if (prev_weight !=3D new_weight && bfqq && = bfqq->wr_coeff =3D=3D 1) >> + bfq_weights_tree_add(bfqq); >>=20 >> new_st->wsum +=3D entity->weight; >>=20 >> @@ -1687,7 +1682,7 @@ void bfq_del_bfqq_busy(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, = bool expiration) >> * Next function is invoked last, because it causes bfqq = to be >> * freed. DO NOT use bfqq after the next function = invocation. >> */ >> - bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, bfqq); >> + bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqq); >> } >> } >>=20 >> @@ -1708,8 +1703,7 @@ void bfq_add_bfqq_busy(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) >> if (!bfqq->dispatched) { >> bfq_add_bfqq_in_groups_with_pending_reqs(bfqq); >> if (bfqq->wr_coeff =3D=3D 1) >> - bfq_weights_tree_add(bfqd, bfqq, >> - &bfqd->queue_weights_tree); >> + bfq_weights_tree_add(bfqq); >> } >>=20 >> if (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1) >> --=20 >> 2.31.1 >>=20 > --=20 > Jan Kara > SUSE Labs, CR