From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Wen Yang <yellowriver2010@hotmail.com>,
Cheng Shengyu <cheng.shengyu@zte.com.cn>,
cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5] Coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device()
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 09:29:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a07c337-533c-61c2-d033-575539309738@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1902160908150.3212@hadrien>
>> We will modify the the if in the when code like this:
>>
>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ if (id == NULL || ...) { ... return ...; }
>> ... when != put_device(&id->dev)
…
>> - when != if (id) { ... put_device(&id->dev) ... }
>> + when != if (...) { ... put_device(&id->dev) ... }
>
> This looks ok.
I have got another different software development opinion also for
such SmPL code in the adjusted line.
I find this specific source code search variant irrelevant
because the shown reference release function should be found
by the first SmPL when specification already.
Would you like to determine generally if the desired function call
is present at all?
Thus I do not see a need (or requirement) for a duplicate search attempt.
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-16 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201902161529041506841@zte.com.cn>
2019-02-16 8:09 ` [v5] Coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device() Julia Lawall
2019-02-16 8:29 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2019-02-16 8:32 ` Julia Lawall
2019-02-16 8:44 ` Markus Elfring
2019-02-15 7:55 [PATCH v5] coccinelle: " Wen Yang
2019-02-15 12:52 ` [PATCH v5] Coccinelle: " Markus Elfring
2019-02-15 13:02 ` Julia Lawall
2019-02-15 13:15 ` [v5] " Markus Elfring
2019-02-15 13:15 ` Markus Elfring
2019-02-15 13:24 ` Julia Lawall
2019-02-15 13:54 ` Markus Elfring
2019-03-17 3:54 ` [PATCH v5] coccinelle: " Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-17 9:05 ` [v5] " Markus Elfring
2019-03-23 16:17 ` Markus Elfring
2019-03-26 6:54 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-26 7:19 ` Julia Lawall
2019-03-26 9:14 ` Markus Elfring
2019-03-26 9:04 ` Markus Elfring
2019-03-26 9:52 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-26 9:58 ` Julia Lawall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a07c337-533c-61c2-d033-575539309738@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
--cc=cheng.shengyu@zte.com.cn \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
--cc=wang.yi59@zte.com.cn \
--cc=wen.yang99@zte.com.cn \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
--cc=yellowriver2010@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).