linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Derrick, Jonathan" <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
To: "heiko@sntech.de" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"kgene@kernel.org" <kgene@kernel.org>,
	"jonathanh@nvidia.com" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	"thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"bjorn.andersson@linaro.org" <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"m.szyprowski@samsung.com" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"jean-philippe@linaro.org" <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	"krzk@kernel.org" <krzk@kernel.org>,
	"robdclark@gmail.com" <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com" <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>,
	"agross@kernel.org" <agross@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" 
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"jroedel@suse.de" <jroedel@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/34] iommu: Split off default domain allocation from group assignment
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 22:10:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a801ff9e6471bda7c6f510dfa2ba7e7c35cb559.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200407183742.4344-12-joro@8bytes.org>

Hi Joerg,

On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 20:37 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> 
> When a bus is initialized with iommu-ops, all devices on the bus are
> scanned and iommu-groups are allocated for them, and each groups will
> also get a default domain allocated.
> 
> Until now this happened as soon as the group was created and the first
> device added to it. When other devices with different default domain
> requirements were added to the group later on, the default domain was
> re-allocated, if possible.
> 
> This resulted in some back and forth and unnecessary allocations, so
> change the flow to defer default domain allocation until all devices
> have been added to their respective IOMMU groups.
> 
> The default domains are allocated for newly allocated groups after
> each device on the bus is handled and was probed by the IOMMU driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> ---
[snip]


I had to add the following for initial VMD support. The new PCIe domain
added on VMD endpoint probe didn't have the dev_iommu member set on the
VMD subdevices, which I'm guessing is due to probe_iommu_group already
having been run on the VMD endpoint's group prior to those subdevices
being added.

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 8a5e1ac328dd..ac1e4fb9bf48 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -1577,6 +1577,9 @@ static int iommu_bus_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
        if (action == BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE) {
                int ret;
 
+               if (!dev_iommu_get(dev))
+                       return -ENOMEM;
+
                ret = iommu_probe_device(dev);
                return (ret) ? NOTIFY_DONE : NOTIFY_OK;
        } else if (action == BUS_NOTIFY_REMOVED_DEVICE) {

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-13 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-07 18:37 [RFC PATCH 00/34] iommu: Move iommu_group setup to IOMMU core code Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 01/34] iommu: Move default domain allocation to separate function Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 02/34] iommu: Add def_domain_type() callback in iommu_ops Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 03/34] iommu/amd: Implement iommu_ops->def_domain_type call-back Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 04/34] iommu/vt-d: Wire up iommu_ops->def_domain_type Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 05/34] iommu/amd: Remove dma_mask check from check_device() Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 06/34] iommu/amd: Return -ENODEV in add_device when device is not handled by IOMMU Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 07/34] iommu: Add probe_device() and remove_device() call-backs Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 08/34] iommu: Move default domain allocation to iommu_probe_device() Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 09/34] iommu: Keep a list of allocated groups in __iommu_probe_device() Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 10/34] iommu: Move new probe_device path to separate function Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 11/34] iommu: Split off default domain allocation from group assignment Joerg Roedel
2020-04-13 22:10   ` Derrick, Jonathan [this message]
2020-04-14 15:27     ` joro
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 12/34] iommu: Move iommu_group_create_direct_mappings() out of iommu_group_add_device() Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 13/34] iommu: Export bus_iommu_probe() and make is safe for re-probing Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 14/34] iommu/amd: Remove dev_data->passthrough Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 15/34] iommu/amd: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 16/34] iommu/vt-d: " Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 17/34] iommu/arm-smmu: Store device instead of group in arm_smmu_s2cr Joerg Roedel
2020-04-08 12:09   ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-08 14:37     ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-08 15:07       ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-08 19:11         ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 18/34] iommu/arm-smmu: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 19/34] iommu/pamu: " Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 20/34] iommu/s390: " Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 21/34] iommu/virtio: " Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 22/34] iommu/msm: " Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 23/34] iommu/mediatek: " Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 24/34] iommu/mediatek-v1 " Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 25/34] iommu/qcom: " Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 26/34] iommu/rockchip: " Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 27/34] iommu/tegra: " Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 28/34] iommu/renesas: " Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 29/34] iommu/omap: Remove orphan_dev tracking Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 30/34] iommu/omap: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 31/34] iommu/exynos: Create iommu_device in struct exynos_iommu_owner Joerg Roedel
2020-04-08 12:23   ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-04-08 14:23     ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-04-08 15:00       ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-09 11:46       ` [PATCH] iommu/exynos: Get rid of 'struct exynos_iommu_owner' exynos_iommu_owner Joerg Roedel
2020-04-09 13:58         ` Marek Szyprowski
     [not found]           ` <CGME20200409140939eucas1p190daac74c0d5dda4627314c49c1a5b50@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2020-04-09 14:09             ` [PATCH] iommu/exynos: Rework intialization Marek Szyprowski
2020-04-09 14:30           ` [PATCH] iommu/exynos: Get rid of 'struct exynos_iommu_owner' exynos_iommu_owner Joerg Roedel
2020-04-14 13:20           ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 32/34] iommu/exynos: Convert to probe/release_device() call-backs Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 33/34] iommu: Remove add_device()/remove_device() code-paths Joerg Roedel
2020-04-10 10:39   ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-04-14 13:17     ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-07 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 34/34] iommu: Unexport iommu_group_get_for_dev() Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6a801ff9e6471bda7c6f510dfa2ba7e7c35cb559.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jonathan.derrick@intel.com \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).