From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>, <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: arm32: panic in move_freepages (Was [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid())
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:48:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ad2956c-70ae-c423-ed7d-88e94c88060f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YIj5zcbHBHt7CC8B@kernel.org>
On 2021/4/28 13:59, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 07:08:59PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> On 2021/4/27 14:23, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:26:38PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>>>> On 2021/4/26 13:20, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 03:51:56PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>>>>>> On 2021/4/25 15:19, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 04:11:16PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tested this patchset(plus arm32 change, like arm64 does)
>>>>>> based on lts 5.10，add some debug log, the useful info shows
>>>>>> below, if we enable HOLES_IN_ZONE, no panic, any idea,
>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are there any changes on top of 5.10 except for pfn_valid() patch?
>>>>>> Do you see this panic on 5.10 without the changes?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, there are some BSP support for arm board based on 5.10,
>>> Is it possible to test 5.12?
> Do you use SPARSMEM? If yes, what is your section size?
> What is the value if CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER in your configuration?
Yes,
CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y
CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_STATIC=y
CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER = 11
CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0xC0000000
CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID=y
CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y
#define SECTION_SIZE_BITS 26
#define MAX_PHYSADDR_BITS 32
#define MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS 32
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-29 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-21 6:51 [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 6:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 10:49 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 6:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] memblock: update initialization of reserved pages Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 7:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21 10:51 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 6:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: decouple check whether pfn is in linear map from pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 10:59 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 12:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 13:13 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 6:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 7:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21 11:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-21 12:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 13:15 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-22 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Kefeng Wang
2021-04-22 7:29 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-22 15:28 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-23 8:11 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-25 7:19 ` arm32: panic in move_freepages (Was [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid()) Mike Rapoport
[not found] ` <52f7d03b-7219-46bc-c62d-b976bc31ebd5@huawei.com>
2021-04-26 5:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-26 15:26 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-27 6:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-27 11:08 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-28 5:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-29 0:48 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2021-04-29 6:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-29 10:22 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-04-30 9:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-30 11:24 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-03 6:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-03 8:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-03 8:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-06 12:47 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-07 7:17 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-07 10:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-07 12:34 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-09 5:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-10 3:10 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-11 8:48 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12 3:08 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12 8:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 3:44 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-13 10:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-14 2:18 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12 3:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-04-25 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ad2956c-70ae-c423-ed7d-88e94c88060f@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).