From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: fsl-sai: new driver
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 10:00:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b092a602b3b8cf09160b1dcb4a282e6@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200102080929.0EE2C215A4@mail.kernel.org>
Hi Stephen,
>> >> + parent_name = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0);
>> >
>> > Could this use the new way of specifying clk parents so that we don't
>> > have to query DT for parent names and just let the core framework do it
>> > whenever it needs to?
>>
>> you mean specifying parent_data with .index = 0? Seems like
>> clk_composite
>> does not support this. The parent can only be specified by supplying
>> the
>> clock names.
>>
>> I could add that in a separate patch. What do you think about the
>> following new functions, where a driver can use parent_data instead
>> of parent_names.
>
> I started doing this in
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190830150923.259497-1-sboyd@kernel.org but
> I
> never got around to the composite clks. Sounds fine to add this new API
> for your use case.
Yeah took me a while to figure out what you've meant by the "new way" ;)
Anyway, I've posted a v3 of this series with the new composite clock
API.
>
>>
>> +struct clk *clk_register_composite_pdata(struct device *dev, const
>> char
>> *name,
>> + const struct clk_parent_data *parent_data,
>> + struct clk_hw *mux_hw, const struct clk_ops *mux_ops,
>> + struct clk_hw *rate_hw, const struct clk_ops
>> *rate_ops,
>> + struct clk_hw *gate_hw, const struct clk_ops
>> *gate_ops,
>> + unsigned long flags);
num_parents was missing here. added that in the v3.
-michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-03 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-09 23:33 [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: document the fsl-sai driver Michael Walle
2019-12-09 23:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: fsl-sai: new driver Michael Walle
2019-12-24 8:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-01-01 15:15 ` Michael Walle
2020-01-02 8:09 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-01-03 9:00 ` Michael Walle [this message]
2019-12-11 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: document the fsl-sai driver Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b092a602b3b8cf09160b1dcb4a282e6@walle.cc \
--to=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).