From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1035516AbdEXNdU (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 May 2017 09:33:20 -0400 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:38228 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967189AbdEXNdR (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 May 2017 09:33:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/103] 4.4.70-stable review To: Mark Brown Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , "kernelci.org bot" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20170523200856.903752266@linuxfoundation.org> <59252147.91471c0a.7a474.26e6@mx.google.com> <20170524070353.GA5785@kroah.com> <956482c6-4666-dee9-69d4-099d0755b6e4@roeck-us.net> <20170524125840.x2vp4ejwrlvehule@sirena.org.uk> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <6caa9abd-c1c1-1873-c9a8-7fd3934020e5@roeck-us.net> Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 06:33:13 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170524125840.x2vp4ejwrlvehule@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/24/2017 05:58 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 05:47:13AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 05/24/2017 12:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >>> 54 passed? I had a bug here such that all x86 builds were crashing, in >>> the core tty layer, which seems odd that anything would be able to boot >>> with this tree... > >> Final qemu test result was >> total: 115 pass: 89 fail: 26 >> with only the x86 and x86_64 images crashing, so this isn't entirely surprising, >> assuming kernelci does not (yet) run any x86/x86_64 qemu tests. > > Not qemu but it has some physical x86 tests like: > > https://storage.kernelci.org/stable-rc/linux-4.4.y/v4.4.69-104-g2ebff3b7590b/x86/x86_64_defconfig/lab-collabora/boot-minnowboard-max.html > > which seem to have managed to boot somehow. It's a minnowboard with no > video and it's booting to a ramdisk, I don't know if either of those > helped avoid the issue. > I had another look; it may be related to the configuration. Turns out I also had crashes in some mips64 and ppc/ppc64 tests, but not all of them. For example, mips64 big endian crashed, but the same configuration little endian passed. I think I'll add some config file variations to my x86 tests. Guenter