From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755989AbdLVOBE (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2017 09:01:04 -0500 Received: from smtp11.infineon.com ([217.10.52.105]:4460 "EHLO smtp11.infineon.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755464AbdLVOBB (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2017 09:01:01 -0500 X-SBRS: None From: To: , , CC: , Subject: RE: [Regression 4.15-rc2] New messages `tpm tpm0: A TPM error (2314) occurred continue selftest` Thread-Topic: [Regression 4.15-rc2] New messages `tpm tpm0: A TPM error (2314) occurred continue selftest` Thread-Index: AQHTbo6YR7tDKQaRfEOmgUOZNLZai6M4Bv0AgAAgEYCAATLQkIAAMoeAgAADEYCAAAL1AIAEfiuAgA/CzwCAAamj8A== Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 14:00:56 +0000 Message-ID: <6d1441dad4bd41f3a680eac850e099e5@infineon.com> References: <32b0e6c1292f4818825e9e0e9bff4d39@infineon.com> <20171207183743.GB16884@ziepe.ca> <37b47bbcce5d4cf1b1fad32576e501d4@infineon.com> <20171208155641.GA2883@ziepe.ca> <20171208161814.GB2883@ziepe.ca> <1513863360.5221.53.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1513863360.5221.53.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.23.8.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id vBME18sq003679 > Hi Paul, > > On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 13:54 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > > Dear Jason, > > > > > > On 12/08/17 17:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 05:07:39PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > > > > > >> I have no access to the system right now, but want to point out, that the > > >> log was created by `journactl -k`, so I do not know if that messes with > the > > >> time stamps. I checked the output of `dmesg` but didn’t see the TPM > error > > >> messages in the output – only `tpm_tis MSFT0101:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id > 0xFE, > > >> rev-id 4)`. Do I need to pass a different error message to `dmesg`? > > > > > > It is a good question, I don't know.. If your kernel isn't setup to > > > timestamp messages then the journalstamp will certainly be garbage. > > > > > > No idea why you wouldn't see the messages in dmesg, if they are not in > > > dmesg they couldn't get into the journal > > > > It looks like I was running an older Linux kernel version, when running > > `dmesg`. Sorry for the noise. Here are the messages with the Linux > > kernel time stamps, showing that the delays work correctly. > > > > ``` > > $ uname -a > > Linux Ixpees 4.15.0-041500rc2-generic #201712031230 SMP Sun Dec 3 > > 17:32:03 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > $ sudo dmesg | grep TPM > > [ 0.000000] ACPI: TPM2 0x000000006F332168 000034 (v03 Tpm2Tabl > > 00000001 AMI 00000000) > > [ 1.114355] tpm_tis MSFT0101:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0xFE, rev-id 4) > > [ 1.125250] tpm tpm0: A TPM error (2314) occurred continue selftest > > [ 1.156645] tpm tpm0: A TPM error (2314) occurred continue selftest > > [ 1.208053] tpm tpm0: A TPM error (2314) occurred continue selftest > > [ 1.299640] tpm tpm0: A TPM error (2314) occurred continue selftest > > [ 1.471223] tpm tpm0: A TPM error (2314) occurred continue selftest > > [ 1.802819] tpm tpm0: A TPM error (2314) occurred continue selftest > > [ 2.454320] tpm tpm0: A TPM error (2314) occurred continue selftest > > [ 3.734808] tpm tpm0: TPM self test failed > > [ 3.759675] ima: No TPM chip found, activating TPM-bypass! (rc=-19) > > ``` > > I've sort of been following this thread, but just want to make sure > that once the self test is/was fixed, that you aren't seeing the IMA > message. > > Assuming this is fixed, could someone provide the commit that fixes > it? I don't think we've found a solution yet. There might be a firmware upgrade that changes that TPM's behavior. Or maybe my latest patch helps? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10130535/ Alexander