From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752766AbeENV27 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2018 17:28:59 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]:34630 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752013AbeENV25 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2018 17:28:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] devfreq: rk3399_dmc: improve rk3399_dmc driver and it's documentation To: myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, Kyungmin Park , "robh+dt@kernel.org" Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "ulf.hansson@linaro.org" , "heiko@sntech.de" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "dbasehore@chromium.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "dianders@google.com" , "groeck@chromium.org" , "kernel@collabora.com" , "hl@rock-chips.com" , Chanwoo Choi , Mark Rutland References: <20180509125749.31318-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> <20180514103218epcms1p487dcebca93bacca64eca1775b2cd826d@epcms1p4> From: Enric Balletbo i Serra Message-ID: <6d9eef64-1ebf-4c4b-dab5-f0cd00ff14f0@collabora.com> Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 23:28:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180514103218epcms1p487dcebca93bacca64eca1775b2cd826d@epcms1p4> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/05/18 12:32, MyungJoo Ham wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> These patches is an attempt to improve a little bit the rk3399_dmc >> driver and it's documentation in order to have all in a better shape for >> a future work I am doing. My final intention is add ddrfreq support for >> rockchip drm driver, but the patches for this are still >> work-in-progress. So let's start with this first patchset that is >> basically some fixes/improvements for the rk3399_dmc driver. >> >> The patches apply on top of current 4.17-rc3. >> >> Best regards, >> Enric >> > > Dear Enric, > > It appears that this patchset is ready to be applied. > > Is "dt-binding" part going to be merged separatedly? > Or may I handle all the 6 commits? (assuming the three dt-binding got acks from dt maintainers) > In my experience (based on other patches I sent for other subsystems) the dt-bindings goes through the same tree as the other patches. So, ideally, you should handle all the 6 commits, but this is a question for the DT maintainers I guess. Maybe Rob or Mark can give us a clue? Thanks, Enric > Cheers, > MyungJoo > >