linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Handle X" <xhandle@gmail.com>
To: "Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>,
	"Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] #define rwxr_xr_x 0755
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:34:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6de39a910607280934t5c264b20w38c1f52c978b4e15@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060727222314.GA9192@atjola.homenet>

On 7/27/06, Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2006.07.28 00:59:11 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > Every time I try to decipher S_I* combos I cry in pain. Often I just
> > refer to include/linux/stat.h defines to find out what mode it is
> > because numbers are actually quickier to understand.
> >
> > Compare and contrast:
> >
> >       0644 vs S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR vs rw_r__r__
> >
> > I'd say #2 really sucks.
>
> IMHO #3 sucks more, it's not as easy to spot when glossing over the
> code, the underscores make it quite ugly (think _r________) and it's
> less "greppable". If I know that there's something that sets S_ISUID, I
> can easily search for that, compare that to [_cpdbl]{1}[r_]{1}[w_]{1}s...
I agree with Steinbink. But how about having macros like,
S_I0700, S_I0070, S_I6444 ..etc. They combine visual appeal of octals,
easy to grep, easy to decipher ...etc.

Regards,
Om.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-28 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-27 20:59 [RFC] #define rwxr_xr_x 0755 Alexey Dobriyan
2006-07-27 22:23 ` Björn Steinbrink
2006-07-28 16:34   ` Handle X [this message]
2006-07-28 16:48     ` Josef Sipek
2006-07-29  1:43       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-07-29  7:59         ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-28  3:22 ` Josef Sipek
2006-07-29 13:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2006-07-28  4:54 Albert Cahalan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6de39a910607280934t5c264b20w38c1f52c978b4e15@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=xhandle@gmail.com \
    --cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).