From: mdalam@codeaurora.org
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: richard@nod.at, boris.brezillon@collabora.com, mani@kernel.org,
krzk@kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sricharan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 23:23:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f21a0cc139546c6351eb4e195dd43bd@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210216091613.1d0e7470@xps13>
On 2021-02-16 13:46, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@codeaurora.org> wrote on Tue, 16 Feb 2021
> 00:46:42 +0530:
>
>> From QPIC version 2.0 onwards new register got added to
>> read last codeword. This change will add the READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n
>> register.
>>
>> For first three code word READ_LOCATION_n register will be
>> use.For last code word READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n register will be
>> use.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> [V6]
>
> It is also very important that you mark the version in the subject:
>
> [PATCH v6] mtd: rawnand: etc
>
> Otherwise it is difficult to keep track on the changes.
Sure I will follow the same.
>
>> * Updated write_reg_dma() function in "v6"
>> * Removed extra indentation level in read_page_ecc() to read last
>> code word in "v6"
>> * Removed boolean check in config_nand_cw_read() in "v6"
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 118
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> index 667e4bf..bae352f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@
>> #define NAND_READ_LOCATION_1 0xf24
>> #define NAND_READ_LOCATION_2 0xf28
>> #define NAND_READ_LOCATION_3 0xf2c
>> +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0 0xf40
>> +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1 0xf44
>> +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2 0xf48
>> +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3 0xf4c
>>
>> /* dummy register offsets, used by write_reg_dma */
>> #define NAND_DEV_CMD1_RESTORE 0xdead
>> @@ -181,8 +185,14 @@
>> #define ECC_BCH_4BIT BIT(2)
>> #define ECC_BCH_8BIT BIT(3)
>>
>> -#define nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, reg, offset, size, is_last) \
>> -nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_##reg, \
>> +#define nandc_set_read_loc_first(nandc, reg, offset, size, is_last) \
>> +nandc_set_reg(nandc, reg, \
>> + ((offset) << READ_LOCATION_OFFSET) | \
>> + ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) | \
>> + ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
>> +
>> +#define nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, reg, offset, size, is_last) \
>> +nandc_set_reg(nandc, reg, \
>> ((offset) << READ_LOCATION_OFFSET) | \
>> ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) | \
>> ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
>> @@ -316,6 +326,10 @@ struct nandc_regs {
>> __le32 read_location1;
>> __le32 read_location2;
>> __le32 read_location3;
>> + __le32 read_location_last0;
>> + __le32 read_location_last1;
>> + __le32 read_location_last2;
>> + __le32 read_location_last3;
>>
>> __le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_clr;
>> __le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_set;
>> @@ -644,6 +658,14 @@ static __le32 *offset_to_nandc_reg(struct
>> nandc_regs *regs, int offset)
>> return ®s->read_location2;
>> case NAND_READ_LOCATION_3:
>> return ®s->read_location3;
>> + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0:
>> + return ®s->read_location_last0;
>> + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1:
>> + return ®s->read_location_last1;
>> + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2:
>> + return ®s->read_location_last2;
>> + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3:
>> + return ®s->read_location_last3;
>> default:
>> return NULL;
>> }
>> @@ -661,6 +683,26 @@ static void nandc_set_reg(struct
>> qcom_nand_controller *nandc, int offset,
>> *reg = cpu_to_le32(val);
>> }
>>
>> +/* helper to configure location register values */
>> +static void nandc_set_read_loc(struct nand_chip *chip, int cw, int
>> reg,
>> + int offset, int size, int is_last)
>
> You know cw, you have access to chip->ecc.steps, so you can derive by
> yourself if is_last is set or not. No need to forward it through
> function calls.
This "is_last" is not for last code word, it will indicate the
Location register "NAND_READ_LOCATION_n" last bit.
bit[31]: Indicate this is the last Read location needing processing.
>
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
>> + struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
>> +
>> + int loc = NAND_READ_LOCATION_0;
>> +
>> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
>> + loc = NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0;
>> +
>> + loc += reg * 4;
>> +
>> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
>
> Just compute is_last a single time at the top of the helper and use it.
This "is_last" is not for last code word, it will indicate the
Location register last bit.
bit[31]: Indicate this is the last Read location needing processing.
>
>> + return nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, loc, offset, size, is_last);
>> + else
>> + return nandc_set_read_loc_first(nandc, loc, offset, size, is_last);
>> +}
>> +
>> /* helper to configure address register values */
>> static void set_address(struct qcom_nand_host *host, u16 column, int
>> page)
>> {
>> @@ -685,6 +727,7 @@ static void update_rw_regs(struct qcom_nand_host
>> *host, int num_cw, bool read)
>> {
>> struct nand_chip *chip = &host->chip;
>> struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
>> + struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
>> u32 cmd, cfg0, cfg1, ecc_bch_cfg;
>>
>> if (read) {
>> @@ -719,9 +762,14 @@ static void update_rw_regs(struct qcom_nand_host
>> *host, int num_cw, bool read)
>> nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_STATUS, host->clrreadstatus);
>> nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1);
>>
>> - if (read)
>> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
>> - host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
>> + if (read) {
>> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
>> + nandc_set_read_loc(chip, ecc->steps - 1, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
>> + host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
>> + else
>> + nandc_set_read_loc(chip, 0, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
>> + host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
>
> Here you should not have this extra indentation level as well,
> nandc_set_read_log() should IMHO be able to hide the complexity of the
> versions.
Yes , this one I will fix in next patch.
>
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -1079,8 +1127,10 @@ static int write_data_dma(struct
>> qcom_nand_controller *nandc, int reg_off,
>> * Helper to prepare DMA descriptors for configuring registers
>> * before reading a NAND page.
>> */
>> -static void config_nand_page_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
>> +static void config_nand_page_read(struct nand_chip *chip)
>> {
>> + struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
>> +
>
> I don't get why you change the parameter from nandc to chip. Honnestly
> I don't think it is a bad thing, I'm just curious to understand why. If
> you want to do that, please start with a first patch just doing the
> conversion, and then a second patch adding LAST_CW support. Otherwise
> it is blurry.
Yes, here its not needed to change nandc to chip, i will revert this
in next patch.
>
>> write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_ADDR0, 2, 0);
>> write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV0_CFG0, 3, 0);
>> write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_EBI2_ECC_BUF_CFG, 1, 0);
>> @@ -1094,11 +1144,19 @@ static void config_nand_page_read(struct
>> qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
>> * before reading each codeword in NAND page.
>> */
>> static void
>> -config_nand_cw_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, bool use_ecc)
>> +config_nand_cw_read(struct nand_chip *chip, bool use_ecc, int cw)
>> {
>> - if (nandc->props->is_bam)
>> - write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_0, 4,
>> - NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>> + struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
>> + struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
>> +
>> + if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
>> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
>> + write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0, 4,
>> + NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>> + else
>> + write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_0, 4,
>> + NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>> + }
>
> Same here, I am pretty sure we can abstract the complexity.
>
Here I did this because , i need pointer to struct nand_ecc_ctrl
structure
to access ecc->steps for CW comparison for last code word. cw ==
(ecc->steps - 1)
So i think no separate patch needed for conversion of nanc-->chip.
Please let me know if still separate patch needed for nanc-->chip
conversion.
>>
>> write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>> write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>> @@ -1117,11 +1175,11 @@ config_nand_cw_read(struct
>> qcom_nand_controller *nandc, bool use_ecc)
>> * single codeword in page
>> */
>> static void
>> -config_nand_single_cw_page_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc,
>> - bool use_ecc)
>> +config_nand_single_cw_page_read(struct nand_chip *chip,
>> + bool use_ecc, int cw)
>> {
>> - config_nand_page_read(nandc);
>> - config_nand_cw_read(nandc, use_ecc);
>> + config_nand_page_read(chip);
>> + config_nand_cw_read(chip, use_ecc, cw);
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -1205,7 +1263,7 @@ static int nandc_param(struct qcom_nand_host
>> *host)
>> nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD_RESTORE, nandc->vld);
>> }
>>
>> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, 512, 1);
>> + nandc_set_read_loc(chip, 0, 0, 0, 512, 1);
>>
>> if (!nandc->props->qpic_v2) {
>> write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD, 1, 0);
>> @@ -1215,7 +1273,7 @@ static int nandc_param(struct qcom_nand_host
>> *host)
>> nandc->buf_count = 512;
>> memset(nandc->data_buffer, 0xff, nandc->buf_count);
>>
>> - config_nand_single_cw_page_read(nandc, false);
>> + config_nand_single_cw_page_read(chip, false, 0);
>>
>> read_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, nandc->data_buffer,
>> nandc->buf_count, 0);
>> @@ -1617,7 +1675,7 @@ qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>> struct nand_chip *chip,
>> clear_bam_transaction(nandc);
>> set_address(host, host->cw_size * cw, page);
>> update_rw_regs(host, 1, true);
>> - config_nand_page_read(nandc);
>> + config_nand_page_read(chip);
>>
>> data_size1 = mtd->writesize - host->cw_size * (ecc->steps - 1);
>> oob_size1 = host->bbm_size;
>> @@ -1633,19 +1691,19 @@ qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>> struct nand_chip *chip,
>> }
>>
>> if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
>> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
>> + nandc_set_read_loc(chip, cw, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
>> read_loc += data_size1;
>>
>> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
>> + nandc_set_read_loc(chip, cw, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
>> read_loc += oob_size1;
>>
>> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
>> + nandc_set_read_loc(chip, cw, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
>> read_loc += data_size2;
>>
>> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
>> + nandc_set_read_loc(chip, cw, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
>> }
>>
>> - config_nand_cw_read(nandc, false);
>> + config_nand_cw_read(chip, false, cw);
>>
>> read_data_dma(nandc, reg_off, data_buf, data_size1, 0);
>> reg_off += data_size1;
>> @@ -1856,7 +1914,7 @@ static int read_page_ecc(struct qcom_nand_host
>> *host, u8 *data_buf,
>> u8 *data_buf_start = data_buf, *oob_buf_start = oob_buf;
>> int i, ret;
>>
>> - config_nand_page_read(nandc);
>> + config_nand_page_read(chip);
>>
>> /* queue cmd descs for each codeword */
>> for (i = 0; i < ecc->steps; i++) {
>> @@ -1873,18 +1931,16 @@ static int read_page_ecc(struct qcom_nand_host
>> *host, u8 *data_buf,
>>
>> if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
>> if (data_buf && oob_buf) {
>> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 0);
>> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, data_size,
>> - oob_size, 1);
>> + nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 0, 0, data_size, 0);
>> + nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 1, data_size, oob_size, 1);
>> } else if (data_buf) {
>> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 1);
>> + nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 0, 0, data_size, 1);
>> } else {
>> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, data_size,
>> - oob_size, 1);
>> + nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 0, data_size, oob_size, 1);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - config_nand_cw_read(nandc, true);
>> + config_nand_cw_read(chip, true, i);
>>
>> if (data_buf)
>> read_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, data_buf,
>> @@ -1946,7 +2002,7 @@ static int copy_last_cw(struct qcom_nand_host
>> *host, int page)
>> set_address(host, host->cw_size * (ecc->steps - 1), page);
>> update_rw_regs(host, 1, true);
>>
>> - config_nand_single_cw_page_read(nandc, host->use_ecc);
>> + config_nand_single_cw_page_read(chip, host->use_ecc, ecc->steps -
>> 1);
>>
>> read_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, nandc->data_buffer, size, 0);
>>
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-16 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-15 19:16 [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register Md Sadre Alam
2021-02-16 8:16 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-16 17:53 ` mdalam [this message]
2021-02-18 9:20 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-18 16:29 ` mdalam
2021-02-21 20:27 ` mdalam
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-02-22 20:04 Md Sadre Alam
2021-02-23 16:34 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-23 19:43 ` mdalam
2021-02-24 4:39 ` mdalam
2021-02-24 6:48 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-24 16:30 ` mdalam
2021-02-24 16:36 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-26 18:25 ` mdalam
2021-02-14 21:17 Md Sadre Alam
2021-02-15 8:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-15 19:19 ` mdalam
2020-12-17 14:02 Md Sadre Alam
2020-12-31 10:53 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-01-04 18:54 ` mdalam
2021-01-05 15:45 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-01-10 3:49 ` mdalam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f21a0cc139546c6351eb4e195dd43bd@codeaurora.org \
--to=mdalam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).