Re: [PATCH] net: cpts: Condition WARN_ON on PTP_1588_CLOCK

[Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>]

On 16/04/2020 11:56, Clay McClure wrote:
> CPTS_MOD merely implies PTP_1588_CLOCK; it is possible to build cpts
> without PTP clock support. In that case, ptp_clock_register() returns
> NULL and we should not WARN_ON(cpts->clock) when downing the interface.
> The ptp_*() functions are stubbed without PTP_1588_CLOCK, so it's safe
> to pass them a null pointer.

Could you explain the purpose of the exercise (Enabling CPTS with PTP_1588_CLOCK disabled), pls?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Clay McClure <clay@daemons.net>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c
> index fd214f8730a9..daf4505f4a70 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c
> @@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpts_register);
>   
>   void cpts_unregister(struct cpts *cpts)
>   {
> -	if (WARN_ON(!cpts->clock))
> +	if (IS_REACHABLE(PTP_1588_CLOCK) && WARN_ON(!cpts->clock))
>   		return;
>   
>   	ptp_clock_unregister(cpts->clock);
> 

-- 
Best regards,
grygorii