linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Neakums <sneakums@zork.net>
To: James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.0-test1-mm1] TCP connections over ipsec hang after a few seconds
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 13:29:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6u8yqt8jq3.fsf@zork.zork.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Mutt.LNX.4.44.0307201552580.22965-100000@excalibur.intercode.com.au> (James Morris's message of "Sun, 20 Jul 2003 15:58:13 +1000 (EST)")

James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au> writes:

> On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Sean Neakums wrote:
>
>> twenty.  The problem seems unrelated to the amount of data
>> transferred; I've tried both bulk rsync transfers and ssh sessions.
>> I've also tested the same boxes over 100baseT; still happens.
>
> It sounds a bit like a pmtu problem related to the wireless bridge, but 
> that would be dependent on amount of data transferred and should not 
> happen on 100baseT.

I am seeing a lot of "pmtu discvovery on SA AH/03537192/c0a80003" type
messages (I forgot to check for them when on 100baseT; will recheck
that).  Are these indicative of such a problem?  I seem to recall that
reducing the max MTU is not as straightforward as just adjusting the
interfaces' mtu setting.  What should I do to eliminate pmtu as the
source of the problem?

> Transport mode (just blowfish encryption) looks to be working ok for me,
> I'm able to ftp uncompressed kernel tarballs between two boxes over 
> gigabit ethernet with no apparent problems.

I had been using 3des with AH; just retried with blowfish 448 and no
AH with much the same result.


  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-20 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-19 13:40 [2.6.0-test1-mm1] TCP connections over ipsec hang after a few seconds Sean Neakums
2003-07-20  5:58 ` James Morris
2003-07-20 12:29   ` Sean Neakums [this message]
2003-07-20 15:21     ` James Morris
2003-07-20 19:23       ` Sean Neakums
2003-07-20 19:47         ` Sean Neakums
2003-07-21  0:28         ` James Morris
2003-07-21  0:37           ` Sean Neakums

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6u8yqt8jq3.fsf@zork.zork.net \
    --to=sneakums@zork.net \
    --cc=jmorris@intercode.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).