From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269107AbTGUAWL (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 20:22:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269120AbTGUAWL (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 20:22:11 -0400 Received: from zork.zork.net ([64.81.246.102]:29825 "EHLO zork.zork.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269107AbTGUAWK (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 20:22:10 -0400 To: James Morris Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, Subject: Re: [2.6.0-test1-mm1] TCP connections over ipsec hang after a few seconds References: From: Sean Neakums Mail-Followup-To: James Morris , netdev@oss.sgi.com, Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 01:37:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: (James Morris's message of "Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:28:09 +1000 (EST)") Message-ID: <6uu19g67gu.fsf@zork.zork.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org James Morris writes: > On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Sean Neakums wrote: > >> > With the 100baseT configuration, are the systems on the same segment? >> >> I'm connecting the two machines with a crossed-over cable. > > I can't see anything strange here. Can you confirm that you are seeing > the pmtu messages for the crossover cable case? If not, perhaps try > manual configuration to rule out any racoon issues. Yes. I checked the logs after I did the recreation, and the pmtu messages are definitely showing up in the crossover case. Will retry with manual config.