From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265179AbTLFOsO (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 09:48:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265191AbTLFOsN (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 09:48:13 -0500 Received: from zork.zork.net ([64.81.246.102]:9603 "EHLO zork.zork.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265179AbTLFOsN (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 09:48:13 -0500 To: William Lee Irwin III Cc: Colin Coe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IRQ balancing References: <3350.192.168.1.3.1070677965.squirrel@www.coesta.com> <20031206024251.GG8039@holomorphy.com> <6u1xri2eng.fsf_-_@zork.zork.net> Reply-To: Sean Neakums From: Sean Neakums Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Colin Coe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 14:48:09 +0000 In-Reply-To: <6u1xri2eng.fsf_-_@zork.zork.net> (Sean Neakums's message of "Sat, 06 Dec 2003 14:40:19 +0000") Message-ID: <6uwu9a0zpy.fsf@zork.zork.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sean Neakums writes: > I noticed something similar way back when, and what I took away from > the ensuing discussion (which may be complete poppycock) was: That is, what I took away from the discussion may be complete poppycock. -- Not bad, for a human.