From: Tadeusz Struk <tstruk@gmail.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeffrin Jose T <jeffrin@rajagiritech.edu.in>,
Alex Guzman <alex@guzman.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Revert "tpm: fix invalid locking in NONBLOCKING mode"
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 14:33:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <705c9df6-e8cd-2829-c579-2bf039360eec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1590523214.15108.4.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On 5/26/20 1:00 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> I don't think there is a root cause other than a TIS TPM is getting
> annoyed by us cycling localities too rapidly because we don't do an
> actual TPM operation between request and relinquish. Since the first
> request/relinquish seems unnecessary for the async case, moving the ops
> get eliminates the problem.
Could be, so maybe we could try both patches.
More debug info on the error path won't hurt.
Thanks,
Tadeusz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-26 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-26 18:32 [PATCH] tpm: Revert "tpm: fix invalid locking in NONBLOCKING mode" Mario Limonciello
2020-05-26 19:14 ` James Bottomley
2020-05-26 19:23 ` Mario.Limonciello
2020-05-26 19:38 ` James Bottomley
2020-05-26 22:19 ` Alex Guzman
2020-05-26 23:06 ` James Bottomley
2020-05-26 23:31 ` Alex Guzman
2020-05-27 0:18 ` James Bottomley
2020-05-27 20:09 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-27 20:18 ` Mario.Limonciello
2020-05-28 0:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-28 0:59 ` Mario.Limonciello
2020-05-28 6:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-26 19:39 ` Tadeusz Struk
2020-05-26 20:00 ` James Bottomley
2020-05-26 21:33 ` Tadeusz Struk [this message]
2020-05-26 22:34 ` Alex Guzman
2020-05-28 0:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-28 4:40 ` Tadeusz Struk
2020-05-28 6:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=705c9df6-e8cd-2829-c579-2bf039360eec@gmail.com \
--to=tstruk@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=alex@guzman.io \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jeffrin@rajagiritech.edu.in \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).