From: "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: include/linux/atomic-arch-fallback.h:60:32: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_cmpxchg64'; did you mean 'arch_cmpxchg'?
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 17:06:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <717d9f89-078b-1698-46fb-9b3393ecddc4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210712143151.GB94622@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>
On 7/12/2021 10:31 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 06:44:47AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> FYI, the error/warning still remains.
>
> I thought we'd already identified that this was an existing bug, and all that
> has changed is the specific error that manifests.
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the feedback, We won't report the error again.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
>
> In v5.13 this would fail with:
>
> | CC drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.o
> | In file included from ./include/linux/atomic.h:84,
> | from drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c:12:
> | drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c: In function 'arm_lpae_install_table':
> | ./include/linux/atomic-fallback.h:60:27: error: implicit declaration of function 'cmpxchg64'; did you mean 'cmpxchg'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> | 60 | #define cmpxchg64_relaxed cmpxchg64
> | | ^~~~~~~~~
> | drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c:320:8: note: in expansion of macro 'cmpxchg64_relaxed'
> | 320 | old = cmpxchg64_relaxed(ptep, curr, new);
> | | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> ... which has the same underlying problem -- the architecture has not provided
> a cmpxchg64() implementation, but the IO pagetable code depends upon
> cmpxchg64().
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
>>
>> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>> head: 1e16624d7b4376797ede36e3c955375cf0f23298
>> commit: bccf1ec369ac126b0997d01a6e1deae00e2cf6b3 locking/atomics: atomic-instrumented: simplify ifdeffery
>> date: 6 weeks ago
>> config: arc-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
>> compiler: arceb-elf-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>> # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bccf1ec369ac126b0997d01a6e1deae00e2cf6b3
>> git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>> git fetch --no-tags linus master
>> git checkout bccf1ec369ac126b0997d01a6e1deae00e2cf6b3
>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arc
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> In file included from include/linux/atomic.h:80,
>> from drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c:12:
>> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c: In function 'arm_lpae_install_table':
>>>> include/linux/atomic-arch-fallback.h:60:32: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_cmpxchg64'; did you mean 'arch_cmpxchg'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> 60 | #define arch_cmpxchg64_relaxed arch_cmpxchg64
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:1261:2: note: in expansion of macro 'arch_cmpxchg64_relaxed'
>> 1261 | arch_cmpxchg64_relaxed(__ai_ptr, __VA_ARGS__); \
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c:320:8: note: in expansion of macro 'cmpxchg64_relaxed'
>> 320 | old = cmpxchg64_relaxed(ptep, curr, new);
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>
>>
>> vim +60 include/linux/atomic-arch-fallback.h
>>
>> 37f8173dd84936 Peter Zijlstra 2020-01-24 56
>> 37f8173dd84936 Peter Zijlstra 2020-01-24 57 #ifndef arch_cmpxchg64_relaxed
>> 37f8173dd84936 Peter Zijlstra 2020-01-24 58 #define arch_cmpxchg64_acquire arch_cmpxchg64
>> 37f8173dd84936 Peter Zijlstra 2020-01-24 59 #define arch_cmpxchg64_release arch_cmpxchg64
>> 29f006fdefe6f8 Peter Zijlstra 2020-08-29 @60 #define arch_cmpxchg64_relaxed arch_cmpxchg64
>> 37f8173dd84936 Peter Zijlstra 2020-01-24 61 #else /* arch_cmpxchg64_relaxed */
>> 37f8173dd84936 Peter Zijlstra 2020-01-24 62
>>
>> :::::: The code at line 60 was first introduced by commit
>> :::::: 29f006fdefe6f88abde973a0b0f20d2704e93fd4 asm-generic/atomic: Add try_cmpxchg() fallbacks
>>
>> :::::: TO: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> :::::: CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
>>
>> ---
>> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
>> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-all-leave@lists.01.org
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-04 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-10 22:44 kernel test robot
2021-07-12 14:31 ` Mark Rutland
2021-08-04 9:06 ` Chen, Rong A [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=717d9f89-078b-1698-46fb-9b3393ecddc4@intel.com \
--to=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--subject='Re: [kbuild-all] Re: include/linux/atomic-arch-fallback.h:60:32: error: implicit declaration of function '\''arch_cmpxchg64'\''; did you mean '\''arch_cmpxchg'\''?' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).