From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E90EC43470 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A47E61989 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235779AbhCaNKe (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:10:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56874 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235219AbhCaNKG (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:10:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AF02C061574; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id w3so30020598ejc.4; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:10:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=NK4vUHta/woqJAuJAeHWHekKytBeMpGPEWYPmmzlnLM=; b=MKxrilH2QI84hoQaekvmb/yVWVOy4ktRSVpOfhG9jllSIWd/5Xed45+KHUI9vaNff0 Zf5yDjPLg+XZ9bY0r73RV5DYPBadM3UeVTkKjQSXJ5RhPE2b7qjF4e4En6pTUNeEKidF ojOiVs6JyB8YjMlcUl+DqoIHgW+FDFrnzWn2BkGEAxXhrkOG3Ru9kgzAwkyNkJTPqfJj iGjLR9d38sK4OJnqwHGKQmzasLqCMJ1AWjvwoKaCtXZda38DbBgoL4EaWRa7nLNbKR0u 61uesxeQXhBRjSGj2dILFxQc7yqE7+8e230oubmQzremIHcUJe1WCJyl99y++N68Begf lJug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=NK4vUHta/woqJAuJAeHWHekKytBeMpGPEWYPmmzlnLM=; b=qql0uSiuLlG2bkKFkTiCWTLjhDYzE+rzqf8kZlRVtOugc4R5rArff4ap11akpXrrCm 5yKl+vQUHYhLx+Tu7wMXVwd+laYeO2M+TUs4OwM3U4wFbqlMGXl100Udgy5+1nr7Bhf3 g1XJHh+DpG5tcOAXJrxZSCcs/dpHP/o26SMyDvvJ9q2eQ4/lyLWO3RPmt/jf0nz9j0c6 32NkzY1k/W+RXKyT4aQW7i74w1J9NO66beKEdUDtDAuLBo3tMUBnDf9vZBKqcPK5K5rg 1lT4VzgxrJjkWT5I+X7+zDMOldp6Y7+Fel8Srj0U9EdjubmWBBUy7Xb/MZYvvLnyS0Zd 7asg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5331Pigg9MAwhCqi2gjNlna/57ax3yOd0TpdMftUtJaqVX2+8rC2 NPVIwrkqKicgMJpxhJjeTSg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEdySfRZdS8SPzH5NG64YArEhPYkWmMZY0hKz8okszlIVGXInzcsAyIPq7l+zj5tiLp+jS2g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c45a:: with SMTP id ck26mr3366433ejb.125.1617196204316; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:908:2612:d580:b423:5e79:2bd2:4a95? ([2a02:908:2612:d580:b423:5e79:2bd2:4a95]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x1sm1200207eji.8.2021.03.31.06.10.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:10:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Norman Maurer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] udp: Add support for getsockopt(..., ..., UDP_GRO, ..., ...) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:10:01 +0200 References: <20210325195614.800687-1-norman_maurer@apple.com> <8eadc07055ac1c99bbc55ea10c7b98acc36dde55.camel@redhat.com> <2e667826f183fbef101a62f0ad8ccb4ed253cb75.camel@redhat.com> To: Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net In-Reply-To: <2e667826f183fbef101a62f0ad8ccb4ed253cb75.camel@redhat.com> Message-Id: <71BBD1B0-FA0A-493D-A1D2-40E7304B0A35@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Friendly ping=E2=80=A6=20 As this missing change was most likely an oversight in the original = commit I do think it should go into 5.12 and subsequently stable as = well. That=E2=80=99s also the reason why I didn=E2=80=99t send a v2 and = changed the commit message / subject for the patch. For me it clearly is = a bug and not a new feature. Thanks Norman > On 26. Mar 2021, at 13:22, Paolo Abeni wrote: >=20 > On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 11:22 +0100, Norman Maurer wrote: >> On 26. Mar 2021, at 10:36, Paolo Abeni wrote: >>> One thing you can do to simplifies the maintainer's life, would be = post >>> a v2 with the correct tag (and ev. obsolete this patch in = patchwork). >>=20 >> I am quite new to contribute patches to the kernel so I am not sure >> how I would =E2=80=9Cobsolete=E2=80=9D this patch and make a v2. If = you can give me >> some pointers I am happy to do so. >=20 > Well, I actually gave you a bad advice about fiddling with patchwork. >=20 > The autoritative documentation: >=20 > Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst >=20 > (inside the kernel tree) suggests to avoid it. >=20 > Just posting a v2 will suffice. >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Paolo >=20