From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2874CC433F5 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233456AbhLTRf1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:35:27 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:60250 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232781AbhLTRfZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:35:25 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D00D6E; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:35:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.2] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80EDC3F774; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:35:23 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RT] BUG in sched/cpupri.c To: John Keeping , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: From: Dietmar Eggemann Message-ID: <71ddbe51-2b7f-2b13-5f22-9013506471dc@arm.com> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:35:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18.12.21 15:25, John Keeping wrote: > Hi, > > On v5.15.10-rt24 (and earlier v5.15 series RT kernels) I'm seeing an > occasional BUG at cpupri.c:151 (full trace below). > > Having added extra logging, it seems that p->prio == 120 which isn't > handled by convert_prio() following commit 934fc3314b39 ("sched/cpupri: > Remap CPUPRI_NORMAL to MAX_RT_PRIO-1"). > > This happens maybe half the time as userspace is starting up, but if the > system boots to a login prompt I haven't seen any issues after that. > The process isn't always the same, I've seen systemd-udevd as well as > pr/ttyS2. > > I can easily "fix" this by handling normal priority tasks in > convert_prio() but I guess there's some wider reason why that's not an > expected value there, so perhaps the real problem lies elsewhere. find_lowest_rq() -> [ cpupri_find() ] -> cpupri_find_fitness() -> convert_prio(p->prio) can only be called for an RT task (p->prio=[0..98]) I can recreate this on my Juno-r0 Arm64 machine with v5.15.10-rt24, CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y . ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 15.256482] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 35 at kernel/sched/rt.c:1898 push_rt_task.part.0+0x190/0x364 [ 15.256521] Modules linked in: [ 15.256532] CPU: 3 PID: 35 Comm: ksoftirqd/3 Not tainted 5.15.10-rt24-dirty #14 [ 15.256546] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r0) (DT) [ 15.256552] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 15.256567] pc : push_rt_task.part.0+0x190/0x364 [ 15.256582] lr : push_rt_task.part.0+0x20/0x364 [ 15.256597] sp : ffff800011ff3e20 [ 15.256602] x29: ffff800011ff3e20 x28: ffff0008001ca940 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 15.256622] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff800011f61da0 x24: 0000000000000001 [ 15.256639] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffff00097ef923c0 x21: ffff0008000e0dc0 [ 15.256657] x20: ffff0008000e0dc0 x19: ffff00097ef923c0 x18: 0000000000000002 [ 15.256674] x17: ffff80096d7e7000 x16: ffff800011ff4000 x15: 0000000000004000 [ 15.256692] x14: 00000000000000c1 x13: 0000000000000001 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 15.256709] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : 0000000000000400 [ 15.256725] x8 : ffff00097ef924c0 x7 : ffff00097ef92440 x6 : 00000000356c5f2b [ 15.256743] x5 : ffff80096d7e7000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000003 [ 15.256760] x2 : ffff00097ef923c0 x1 : 0000000000000062 x0 : 0000000000000078 [ 15.256777] Call trace: [ 15.256783] push_rt_task.part.0+0x190/0x364 [ 15.256799] rto_push_irq_work_func+0x180/0x190 [ 15.256815] irq_work_single+0x34/0xa0 [ 15.256829] flush_smp_call_function_queue+0x138/0x244 [ 15.256845] generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x18/0x24 [ 15.256860] ipi_handler+0xb0/0x15c [ 15.256875] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x88/0x140 [ 15.256890] handle_domain_irq+0x64/0x94 [ 15.256907] gic_handle_irq+0x50/0xf0 [ 15.256924] call_on_irq_stack+0x2c/0x60 [ 15.256937] do_interrupt_handler+0x54/0x60 [ 15.256951] el1_interrupt+0x30/0x80 [ 15.256965] el1h_64_irq_handler+0x1c/0x30 [ 15.256978] el1h_64_irq+0x78/0x7c [ 15.256989] preempt_schedule_irq+0x40/0x150 [ 15.257004] el1_interrupt+0x60/0x80 [ 15.257016] el1h_64_irq_handler+0x1c/0x30 [ 15.257029] el1h_64_irq+0x78/0x7c [ 15.257039] run_ksoftirqd+0x94/0xc0 [ 15.257053] smpboot_thread_fn+0x2d8/0x320 [ 15.257066] kthread+0x18c/0x1a0 [ 15.257081] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 15.257094] ---[ end trace 0000000000000002 ]--- [ 16.257349] next_task=[rcu_preempt 11] rq->curr=[ksoftirqd/3 35] root@juno:~# ps -eTo comm,pid,lwp,pri,rtprio,nice,class | more COMMAND PID LWP PRI RTPRIO NI CLS .. rcu_preempt 11 11 41 1 - FF ... ksoftirqd/3 35 35 19 - 0 TS ... diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c index ef8228d19382..798887f1eeff 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c @@ -1895,9 +1895,17 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq, bool pull) struct task_struct *push_task = NULL; int cpu; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!rt_task(rq->curr))) { + printk("next_task=[%s %d] rq->curr=[%s %d]\n", + next_task->comm, next_task->pid, rq->curr->comm, rq->curr->pid); + } + if (!pull || rq->push_busy) return 0; + if (!rt_task(rq->curr)) + return 0; + cpu = find_lowest_rq(rq->curr); if (cpu == -1 || cpu == rq->cpu) return 0; The 2. condition prevents the BUG_ON() in cpupri_find_fitness(). [...]