From: Todor Tomov <todor.tomov@linaro.org>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] PM / Domains: Add support for explicit control of PM domains
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 19:36:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72397ec8-d169-c5b1-2120-459031b35d48@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5fcfeda6-f95c-cdaa-73a5-5c7499a3f9f5@codeaurora.org>
Hi,
On 30.05.2017 06:41, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> []..
>
>>>> I was proposing to have such a lower-layer by splitting the existing
>>>> genpd framework so the drivers would have the option of calling the
>>>> lower-level power control functions to look-up pm-domains and control
>>>> them directly from their rpm callbacks (if they need to). Same as we do
>>>> for clocks. This way you would not need to mess with the genpd ->start()
>>>> callback and leave it to the driver to handle itself as it knows what
>>>> needs to be done. This assumes that the device is never bound to the
>>>> pm-domain by the genpd core.
>>>
>>> Yes, agree! To me this is the only solution what would really work.
>>
>> I agree! :-)
>>
>>> Perhaps Rafael can confirm that he is fine with a solution like this?
>>
>> Yes and Rafael, please can you also elaborate on what you meant by
>> "allow genpd to use either a list of power resources or the on/off
>> callbacks provided by itself to cover different use cases"?
>>
>> I would like to understand exactly what you meant by allowing genpd to
>> use a list of power resources (ie. how you envisioned we could achieve
>> this).
>
> While thinking through the problem of devices associated with multiple Power
> domains (or power resources) and controlling them individually (or together)
> I was wondering if something like a PM domain governor (with PM resource
> level constraints) could help.
>
> So with just one set of PM domain callbacks, its quite easy to control multiple power
> resources, if they need to be *all* turned on/off together, using something similar to
> what Jon proposed in his RFC [1]
>
> However, there could be instances where in we might need to control them individually
> and in such cases we could hook up a PM domain governor which decides if an individual
> PM resource can be turned on or off while the device is runtime suspended/resumed.
> We can expose some PM resource level QoS APIs which the drivers can use to express their
> needs, which the PM domain governor then takes into account during the decision making.
>
> if this seems worth pursuing further, I can post some RFCs on these lines and
> get the discussion going.
>
> thanks,
> Rajendra
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/20/173
>
I have come to a similar case with multiple power domains on Qualcomm APQ8096 - the
camera subsystem has two VFE modules (Video Front End - these are image processing modules)
and each of them has a separate power domain but we might want to control these from
a single driver.
So I wanted to ask if there have been any news on this topic lately?
Thank you.
Best regards,
Todor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-09 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-28 14:13 [RFC PATCH 0/4] PM / Domains: Add support for explicit control of PM domains Jon Hunter
2017-03-28 14:14 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] PM / Domains: Prepare for supporting explicit PM domain control Jon Hunter
2017-03-28 14:14 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] PM / Domains: Add support for explicit control of PM domains Jon Hunter
2017-04-10 4:09 ` Rajendra Nayak
2017-04-10 8:24 ` Jon Hunter
2017-04-10 10:02 ` Rajendra Nayak
2017-04-10 19:48 ` Jon Hunter
2017-03-28 14:14 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] PM / Domains: Add OF helpers for getting " Jon Hunter
2017-03-28 14:14 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Add support for devices with multiple " Jon Hunter
2017-04-10 4:12 ` Rajendra Nayak
2017-04-10 8:24 ` Jon Hunter
2017-04-25 11:13 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] PM / Domains: Add support for explicit control of " Jon Hunter
2017-04-25 19:34 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-04-25 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-05-02 10:10 ` Jon Hunter
2017-05-02 21:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-05-03 8:12 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-05-03 8:32 ` Jon Hunter
2017-05-03 13:43 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-05-03 14:57 ` Jon Hunter
2017-05-03 17:12 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-05-04 8:44 ` Jon Hunter
2017-05-30 3:41 ` Rajendra Nayak
2017-10-09 16:36 ` Todor Tomov [this message]
2017-10-10 9:13 ` Jon Hunter
2017-05-03 8:12 ` Jon Hunter
2017-04-26 8:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-26 9:04 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-04-26 9:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-26 9:55 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-05-03 6:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-05-03 8:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72397ec8-d169-c5b1-2120-459031b35d48@linaro.org \
--to=todor.tomov@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).