linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Michael Ellerman' <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: mainline build failure of powerpc allmodconfig for prom_init_check
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 07:51:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <72a95f0949d149d1b07bd161f3d59cc1@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87cze3docs.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>

From: Michael Ellerman
> Sent: 18 July 2022 05:41
...
> So we're memsetting all of args to 254, not zero.
> 
> That's happening because allmodconfig with gcc 12 enables
> CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_PATTERN, whereas gcc 11 doesn't.

I can't help feeling it would be better if that generated
a call to a memset64() function.
Saving loads of tests at the top of the function,
and (most of?) the constant expansion to 64bit.

Although and explicit 'stack clear' function would be better
for the kernel - since it would give the option of patching
it away at startup.

I really can't help feeling that initialising on-stack
arrays will kill performance.
While kernel stack frames have to be relatively small,
in userspace very large on-stack arrays can be allocated
(and correctly bound checked) knowing that the cost is
minimal (maybe a TLB miss).

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-18  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-14  8:55 mainline build failure of powerpc allmodconfig for prom_init_check Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2022-07-17  9:12 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2022-07-17 14:44   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-17 19:54     ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-07-18  3:52       ` Michael Ellerman
2022-07-18 14:56         ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-07-17 20:25     ` Sudip Mukherjee
2022-07-17 20:29       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-17 20:38         ` Sudip Mukherjee
2022-07-17 20:56           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-17 20:56         ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-07-17 21:11           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-17 21:45             ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-07-18  1:38               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-18  4:41   ` Michael Ellerman
2022-07-18  7:51     ` David Laight [this message]
2022-07-18 13:44     ` [PATCH] powerpc/64s: Disable stack variable initialisation for prom_init Michael Ellerman
2022-07-18 15:03       ` Sudip Mukherjee
2022-07-18 18:34       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-18 19:06     ` mainline build failure of powerpc allmodconfig for prom_init_check Linus Torvalds
2022-07-18 22:08       ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-07-18 22:55         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-19 13:35       ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=72a95f0949d149d1b07bd161f3d59cc1@AcuMS.aculab.com \
    --to=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).