* [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd @ 2021-06-16 5:33 Hsin-Yi Wang 2021-06-16 5:58 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-06-16 7:55 ` Viresh Kumar 0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Hsin-Yi Wang @ 2021-06-16 5:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Viresh Kumar ), Chanwoo Choi Cc: Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd, linux-pm, linux-kernel, andrew-sh . cheng Don't limit required_opp_table to genpd only. One possible use case is cpufreq based devfreq governor, which can use required-opps property to derive devfreq from cpufreq. Suggested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org> --- This is tested with the non genpd case mt8183-cci with passive governor[1]. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1616499241-4906-2-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com/ --- drivers/opp/of.c | 20 +------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c index aa75a1caf08a3..9573facce53a5 100644 --- a/drivers/opp/of.c +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c @@ -201,17 +201,6 @@ static void _opp_table_alloc_required_tables(struct opp_table *opp_table, lazy = true; continue; } - - /* - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, - * as we don't know how much about other cases. Error out if the - * required OPP doesn't belong to a genpd. - */ - if (!required_opp_tables[i]->is_genpd) { - dev_err(dev, "required-opp doesn't belong to genpd: %pOF\n", - required_np); - goto free_required_tables; - } } /* Let's do the linking later on */ @@ -379,13 +368,6 @@ static void lazy_link_required_opp_table(struct opp_table *new_table) struct dev_pm_opp *opp; int i, ret; - /* - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, - * as we don't know much about other cases. - */ - if (!new_table->is_genpd) - return; - mutex_lock(&opp_table_lock); list_for_each_entry_safe(opp_table, temp, &lazy_opp_tables, lazy) { @@ -873,7 +855,7 @@ static struct dev_pm_opp *_opp_add_static_v2(struct opp_table *opp_table, return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); ret = _read_opp_key(new_opp, opp_table, np, &rate_not_available); - if (ret < 0 && !opp_table->is_genpd) { + if (ret < 0) { dev_err(dev, "%s: opp key field not found\n", __func__); goto free_opp; } -- 2.32.0.272.g935e593368-goog ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd 2021-06-16 5:33 [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd Hsin-Yi Wang @ 2021-06-16 5:58 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-06-16 6:25 ` Hsin-Yi Wang 2021-06-16 7:55 ` Viresh Kumar 1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Viresh Kumar @ 2021-06-16 5:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hsin-Yi Wang Cc: Viresh Kumar ), Chanwoo Choi, Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd, linux-pm, linux-kernel, andrew-sh . cheng On 16-06-21, 13:33, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: > Don't limit required_opp_table to genpd only. One possible use case is > cpufreq based devfreq governor, which can use required-opps property to > derive devfreq from cpufreq. > > Suggested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org> > --- > This is tested with the non genpd case mt8183-cci with passive > governor[1]. > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1616499241-4906-2-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com/ > --- > drivers/opp/of.c | 20 +------------------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c > index aa75a1caf08a3..9573facce53a5 100644 > --- a/drivers/opp/of.c > +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c > @@ -201,17 +201,6 @@ static void _opp_table_alloc_required_tables(struct opp_table *opp_table, > lazy = true; > continue; > } > - > - /* > - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, > - * as we don't know how much about other cases. Error out if the > - * required OPP doesn't belong to a genpd. > - */ > - if (!required_opp_tables[i]->is_genpd) { > - dev_err(dev, "required-opp doesn't belong to genpd: %pOF\n", > - required_np); > - goto free_required_tables; > - } > } > > /* Let's do the linking later on */ > @@ -379,13 +368,6 @@ static void lazy_link_required_opp_table(struct opp_table *new_table) > struct dev_pm_opp *opp; > int i, ret; > > - /* > - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, > - * as we don't know much about other cases. > - */ > - if (!new_table->is_genpd) > - return; > - > mutex_lock(&opp_table_lock); > > list_for_each_entry_safe(opp_table, temp, &lazy_opp_tables, lazy) { > @@ -873,7 +855,7 @@ static struct dev_pm_opp *_opp_add_static_v2(struct opp_table *opp_table, > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > ret = _read_opp_key(new_opp, opp_table, np, &rate_not_available); > - if (ret < 0 && !opp_table->is_genpd) { > + if (ret < 0) { > dev_err(dev, "%s: opp key field not found\n", __func__); > goto free_opp; > } How are you setting the required OPPs ? I mean when someone tries to change frequency of a device which has some required-opps, who is configuring those required OPPs ? -- viresh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd 2021-06-16 5:58 ` Viresh Kumar @ 2021-06-16 6:25 ` Hsin-Yi Wang 2021-06-16 7:09 ` Viresh Kumar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Hsin-Yi Wang @ 2021-06-16 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Viresh Kumar ), Chanwoo Choi, Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd, Linux PM, lkml, andrew-sh . cheng On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 1:58 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 16-06-21, 13:33, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: > > Don't limit required_opp_table to genpd only. One possible use case is > > cpufreq based devfreq governor, which can use required-opps property to > > derive devfreq from cpufreq. > > > > Suggested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> > > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org> > > --- > > This is tested with the non genpd case mt8183-cci with passive > > governor[1]. > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1616499241-4906-2-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com/ > > --- > > drivers/opp/of.c | 20 +------------------- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c > > index aa75a1caf08a3..9573facce53a5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/opp/of.c > > +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c > > @@ -201,17 +201,6 @@ static void _opp_table_alloc_required_tables(struct opp_table *opp_table, > > lazy = true; > > continue; > > } > > - > > - /* > > - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, > > - * as we don't know how much about other cases. Error out if the > > - * required OPP doesn't belong to a genpd. > > - */ > > - if (!required_opp_tables[i]->is_genpd) { > > - dev_err(dev, "required-opp doesn't belong to genpd: %pOF\n", > > - required_np); > > - goto free_required_tables; > > - } > > } > > > > /* Let's do the linking later on */ > > @@ -379,13 +368,6 @@ static void lazy_link_required_opp_table(struct opp_table *new_table) > > struct dev_pm_opp *opp; > > int i, ret; > > > > - /* > > - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, > > - * as we don't know much about other cases. > > - */ > > - if (!new_table->is_genpd) > > - return; > > - > > mutex_lock(&opp_table_lock); > > > > list_for_each_entry_safe(opp_table, temp, &lazy_opp_tables, lazy) { > > @@ -873,7 +855,7 @@ static struct dev_pm_opp *_opp_add_static_v2(struct opp_table *opp_table, > > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > > > ret = _read_opp_key(new_opp, opp_table, np, &rate_not_available); > > - if (ret < 0 && !opp_table->is_genpd) { > > + if (ret < 0) { > > dev_err(dev, "%s: opp key field not found\n", __func__); > > goto free_opp; > > } > > How are you setting the required OPPs ? I mean when someone tries to > change frequency of a device which has some required-opps, who is > configuring those required OPPs ? > When cpufreq changes, the (cpufreq based) passive governor will calculate a target devfreq based on that, and the device governor (mt8183-cci-devfreq) will change the actual opp of the device. The required-opp is set in the cpufreq table: cpufreq_opp_table: opp_table0 { compatible = "operating-points-v2"; opp-shared; ... opp0_01 { opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <910000000>; opp-microvolt = <687500>; required-opps = <&opp2_01>; }; ... }; devfreq_opp_table: opp_table2 { compatible = "operating-points-v2"; opp-shared; ... opp2_01: opp-338000000 { opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <338000000>; opp-microvolt = <687500>; }; ... }; > -- > viresh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd 2021-06-16 6:25 ` Hsin-Yi Wang @ 2021-06-16 7:09 ` Viresh Kumar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Viresh Kumar @ 2021-06-16 7:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hsin-Yi Wang Cc: Viresh Kumar ), Chanwoo Choi, Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd, Linux PM, lkml, andrew-sh . cheng On 16-06-21, 14:25, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: > When cpufreq changes, the (cpufreq based) passive governor will > calculate a target devfreq based on that, and the device governor > (mt8183-cci-devfreq) will change the actual opp of the device. > > The required-opp is set in the cpufreq table: > > cpufreq_opp_table: opp_table0 { > compatible = "operating-points-v2"; > opp-shared; > ... > opp0_01 { > opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <910000000>; > opp-microvolt = <687500>; > required-opps = <&opp2_01>; > }; > ... > }; > > devfreq_opp_table: opp_table2 { > compatible = "operating-points-v2"; > opp-shared; > ... > opp2_01: opp-338000000 { > opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <338000000>; > opp-microvolt = <687500>; > }; > ... > }; Ah, you aren't using dev_pm_opp_set_opp() or dev_pm_opp_set_rate() interfaces. Looks okay then. -- viresh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd 2021-06-16 5:33 [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd Hsin-Yi Wang 2021-06-16 5:58 ` Viresh Kumar @ 2021-06-16 7:55 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-06-16 8:47 ` Chanwoo Choi 1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Viresh Kumar @ 2021-06-16 7:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hsin-Yi Wang Cc: Viresh Kumar ), Chanwoo Choi, Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd, linux-pm, linux-kernel, andrew-sh . cheng On 16-06-21, 13:33, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: > Don't limit required_opp_table to genpd only. One possible use case is > cpufreq based devfreq governor, which can use required-opps property to > derive devfreq from cpufreq. > > Suggested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org> > --- > This is tested with the non genpd case mt8183-cci with passive > governor[1]. > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1616499241-4906-2-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com/ > --- > drivers/opp/of.c | 20 +------------------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c > index aa75a1caf08a3..9573facce53a5 100644 > --- a/drivers/opp/of.c > +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c > @@ -201,17 +201,6 @@ static void _opp_table_alloc_required_tables(struct opp_table *opp_table, > lazy = true; > continue; > } > - > - /* > - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, > - * as we don't know how much about other cases. Error out if the > - * required OPP doesn't belong to a genpd. > - */ > - if (!required_opp_tables[i]->is_genpd) { > - dev_err(dev, "required-opp doesn't belong to genpd: %pOF\n", > - required_np); > - goto free_required_tables; > - } > } > > /* Let's do the linking later on */ > @@ -379,13 +368,6 @@ static void lazy_link_required_opp_table(struct opp_table *new_table) > struct dev_pm_opp *opp; > int i, ret; > > - /* > - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, > - * as we don't know much about other cases. > - */ > - if (!new_table->is_genpd) > - return; > - > mutex_lock(&opp_table_lock); > > list_for_each_entry_safe(opp_table, temp, &lazy_opp_tables, lazy) { > @@ -873,7 +855,7 @@ static struct dev_pm_opp *_opp_add_static_v2(struct opp_table *opp_table, > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > ret = _read_opp_key(new_opp, opp_table, np, &rate_not_available); > - if (ret < 0 && !opp_table->is_genpd) { > + if (ret < 0) { > dev_err(dev, "%s: opp key field not found\n", __func__); > goto free_opp; > } Plus this and few changes to commit log. diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c index e366218d6736..b335c077f215 100644 --- a/drivers/opp/core.c +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c @@ -893,6 +893,16 @@ static int _set_required_opps(struct device *dev, if (!required_opp_tables) return 0; + /* + * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, as we + * don't know much about other use cases. Error out if the required OPP + * doesn't belong to a genpd. + */ + if (unlikely(!required_opp_tables[0]->is_genpd)) { + dev_err(dev, "required-opps don't belong to a genpd\n"); + return -ENOENT; + } + /* required-opps not fully initialized yet */ if (lazy_linking_pending(opp_table)) return -EBUSY; Applied. Thanks. -- viresh ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd 2021-06-16 7:55 ` Viresh Kumar @ 2021-06-16 8:47 ` Chanwoo Choi 2021-06-16 9:09 ` Viresh Kumar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Chanwoo Choi @ 2021-06-16 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Viresh Kumar, Hsin-Yi Wang Cc: Viresh Kumar ), Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd, linux-pm, linux-kernel, andrew-sh . cheng On 6/16/21 4:55 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 16-06-21, 13:33, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: >> Don't limit required_opp_table to genpd only. One possible use case is >> cpufreq based devfreq governor, which can use required-opps property to >> derive devfreq from cpufreq. >> >> Suggested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org> >> --- >> This is tested with the non genpd case mt8183-cci with passive >> governor[1]. >> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1616499241-4906-2-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com/ >> --- >> drivers/opp/of.c | 20 +------------------- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c >> index aa75a1caf08a3..9573facce53a5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/opp/of.c >> +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c >> @@ -201,17 +201,6 @@ static void _opp_table_alloc_required_tables(struct opp_table *opp_table, >> lazy = true; >> continue; >> } >> - >> - /* >> - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, >> - * as we don't know how much about other cases. Error out if the >> - * required OPP doesn't belong to a genpd. >> - */ >> - if (!required_opp_tables[i]->is_genpd) { >> - dev_err(dev, "required-opp doesn't belong to genpd: %pOF\n", >> - required_np); >> - goto free_required_tables; >> - } >> } >> >> /* Let's do the linking later on */ >> @@ -379,13 +368,6 @@ static void lazy_link_required_opp_table(struct opp_table *new_table) >> struct dev_pm_opp *opp; >> int i, ret; >> >> - /* >> - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, >> - * as we don't know much about other cases. >> - */ >> - if (!new_table->is_genpd) >> - return; >> - >> mutex_lock(&opp_table_lock); >> >> list_for_each_entry_safe(opp_table, temp, &lazy_opp_tables, lazy) { >> @@ -873,7 +855,7 @@ static struct dev_pm_opp *_opp_add_static_v2(struct opp_table *opp_table, >> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >> >> ret = _read_opp_key(new_opp, opp_table, np, &rate_not_available); >> - if (ret < 0 && !opp_table->is_genpd) { >> + if (ret < 0) { >> dev_err(dev, "%s: opp key field not found\n", __func__); >> goto free_opp; >> } > > Plus this and few changes to commit log. > > diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c > index e366218d6736..b335c077f215 100644 > --- a/drivers/opp/core.c > +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c > @@ -893,6 +893,16 @@ static int _set_required_opps(struct device *dev, > if (!required_opp_tables) > return 0; > > + /* > + * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, as we > + * don't know much about other use cases. Error out if the required OPP > + * doesn't belong to a genpd. > + */ > + if (unlikely(!required_opp_tables[0]->is_genpd)) { > + dev_err(dev, "required-opps don't belong to a genpd\n"); > + return -ENOENT; > + } > + If you add this checking statement, I think that when using dev_pm_opp_set_rate with required-opp property, it will be failed. > /* required-opps not fully initialized yet */ > if (lazy_linking_pending(opp_table)) > return -EBUSY; > > Applied. Thanks. > -- Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi Samsung Electronics ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd 2021-06-16 8:47 ` Chanwoo Choi @ 2021-06-16 9:09 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-06-16 9:20 ` Hsin-Yi Wang 2021-06-17 1:13 ` Chanwoo Choi 0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Viresh Kumar @ 2021-06-16 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chanwoo Choi Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang, Viresh Kumar ), Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd, linux-pm, linux-kernel, andrew-sh . cheng On 16-06-21, 17:47, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > On 6/16/21 4:55 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 16-06-21, 13:33, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: > >> Don't limit required_opp_table to genpd only. One possible use case is > >> cpufreq based devfreq governor, which can use required-opps property to > >> derive devfreq from cpufreq. > >> > >> Suggested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org> > >> --- > >> This is tested with the non genpd case mt8183-cci with passive > >> governor[1]. > >> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1616499241-4906-2-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com/ > >> --- > >> drivers/opp/of.c | 20 +------------------- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c > >> index aa75a1caf08a3..9573facce53a5 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/opp/of.c > >> +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c > >> @@ -201,17 +201,6 @@ static void _opp_table_alloc_required_tables(struct opp_table *opp_table, > >> lazy = true; > >> continue; > >> } > >> - > >> - /* > >> - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, > >> - * as we don't know how much about other cases. Error out if the > >> - * required OPP doesn't belong to a genpd. > >> - */ > >> - if (!required_opp_tables[i]->is_genpd) { > >> - dev_err(dev, "required-opp doesn't belong to genpd: %pOF\n", > >> - required_np); > >> - goto free_required_tables; > >> - } > >> } > >> > >> /* Let's do the linking later on */ > >> @@ -379,13 +368,6 @@ static void lazy_link_required_opp_table(struct opp_table *new_table) > >> struct dev_pm_opp *opp; > >> int i, ret; > >> > >> - /* > >> - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, > >> - * as we don't know much about other cases. > >> - */ > >> - if (!new_table->is_genpd) > >> - return; > >> - > >> mutex_lock(&opp_table_lock); > >> > >> list_for_each_entry_safe(opp_table, temp, &lazy_opp_tables, lazy) { > >> @@ -873,7 +855,7 @@ static struct dev_pm_opp *_opp_add_static_v2(struct opp_table *opp_table, > >> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > >> > >> ret = _read_opp_key(new_opp, opp_table, np, &rate_not_available); > >> - if (ret < 0 && !opp_table->is_genpd) { > >> + if (ret < 0) { > >> dev_err(dev, "%s: opp key field not found\n", __func__); > >> goto free_opp; > >> } > > > > Plus this and few changes to commit log. > > > > diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c > > index e366218d6736..b335c077f215 100644 > > --- a/drivers/opp/core.c > > +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c > > @@ -893,6 +893,16 @@ static int _set_required_opps(struct device *dev, > > if (!required_opp_tables) > > return 0; > > > > + /* > > + * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, as we > > + * don't know much about other use cases. Error out if the required OPP > > + * doesn't belong to a genpd. > > + */ > > + if (unlikely(!required_opp_tables[0]->is_genpd)) { > > + dev_err(dev, "required-opps don't belong to a genpd\n"); > > + return -ENOENT; > > + } > > + > > If you add this checking statement, I think that > when using dev_pm_opp_set_rate with required-opp property, it will be failed. Yes, that is exactly what I am trying to do here. Hsin already confirmed that you guys won't use this API, isn't ? The point here is that the _set_required_opps() function only updates the performance state of genpds today. So it won't work for you guys anyway. -- viresh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd 2021-06-16 9:09 ` Viresh Kumar @ 2021-06-16 9:20 ` Hsin-Yi Wang 2021-06-17 1:13 ` Chanwoo Choi 1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Hsin-Yi Wang @ 2021-06-16 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Chanwoo Choi, Viresh Kumar ), Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd, Linux PM, lkml, andrew-sh . cheng On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 5:09 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 16-06-21, 17:47, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > > On 6/16/21 4:55 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > On 16-06-21, 13:33, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: > > >> Don't limit required_opp_table to genpd only. One possible use case is > > >> cpufreq based devfreq governor, which can use required-opps property to > > >> derive devfreq from cpufreq. > > >> > > >> Suggested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> > > >> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org> > > >> --- > > >> This is tested with the non genpd case mt8183-cci with passive > > >> governor[1]. > > >> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1616499241-4906-2-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com/ > > >> --- > > >> drivers/opp/of.c | 20 +------------------- > > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c > > >> index aa75a1caf08a3..9573facce53a5 100644 > > >> --- a/drivers/opp/of.c > > >> +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c > > >> @@ -201,17 +201,6 @@ static void _opp_table_alloc_required_tables(struct opp_table *opp_table, > > >> lazy = true; > > >> continue; > > >> } > > >> - > > >> - /* > > >> - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, > > >> - * as we don't know how much about other cases. Error out if the > > >> - * required OPP doesn't belong to a genpd. > > >> - */ > > >> - if (!required_opp_tables[i]->is_genpd) { > > >> - dev_err(dev, "required-opp doesn't belong to genpd: %pOF\n", > > >> - required_np); > > >> - goto free_required_tables; > > >> - } > > >> } > > >> > > >> /* Let's do the linking later on */ > > >> @@ -379,13 +368,6 @@ static void lazy_link_required_opp_table(struct opp_table *new_table) > > >> struct dev_pm_opp *opp; > > >> int i, ret; > > >> > > >> - /* > > >> - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, > > >> - * as we don't know much about other cases. > > >> - */ > > >> - if (!new_table->is_genpd) > > >> - return; > > >> - > > >> mutex_lock(&opp_table_lock); > > >> > > >> list_for_each_entry_safe(opp_table, temp, &lazy_opp_tables, lazy) { > > >> @@ -873,7 +855,7 @@ static struct dev_pm_opp *_opp_add_static_v2(struct opp_table *opp_table, > > >> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > >> > > >> ret = _read_opp_key(new_opp, opp_table, np, &rate_not_available); > > >> - if (ret < 0 && !opp_table->is_genpd) { > > >> + if (ret < 0) { > > >> dev_err(dev, "%s: opp key field not found\n", __func__); > > >> goto free_opp; > > >> } > > > > > > Plus this and few changes to commit log. > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c > > > index e366218d6736..b335c077f215 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/opp/core.c > > > +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c > > > @@ -893,6 +893,16 @@ static int _set_required_opps(struct device *dev, > > > if (!required_opp_tables) > > > return 0; > > > > > > + /* > > > + * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, as we > > > + * don't know much about other use cases. Error out if the required OPP > > > + * doesn't belong to a genpd. > > > + */ > > > + if (unlikely(!required_opp_tables[0]->is_genpd)) { > > > + dev_err(dev, "required-opps don't belong to a genpd\n"); > > > + return -ENOENT; > > > + } > > > + > > > > If you add this checking statement, I think that > > when using dev_pm_opp_set_rate with required-opp property, it will be failed. > > Yes, that is exactly what I am trying to do here. Hsin already > confirmed that you guys won't use this API, isn't ? we used clk_set_rate() and regulator_set_voltage(). > > The point here is that the _set_required_opps() function only updates > the performance state of genpds today. So it won't work for you guys > anyway. > > -- > viresh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd 2021-06-16 9:09 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-06-16 9:20 ` Hsin-Yi Wang @ 2021-06-17 1:13 ` Chanwoo Choi 2021-06-17 3:33 ` Viresh Kumar 1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Chanwoo Choi @ 2021-06-17 1:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang, Viresh Kumar ), Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd, linux-pm, linux-kernel, andrew-sh . cheng On 6/16/21 6:09 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 16-06-21, 17:47, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> On 6/16/21 4:55 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> On 16-06-21, 13:33, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: >>>> Don't limit required_opp_table to genpd only. One possible use case is >>>> cpufreq based devfreq governor, which can use required-opps property to >>>> derive devfreq from cpufreq. >>>> >>>> Suggested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org> >>>> --- >>>> This is tested with the non genpd case mt8183-cci with passive >>>> governor[1]. >>>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1616499241-4906-2-git-send-email-andrew-sh.cheng@mediatek.com/ >>>> --- >>>> drivers/opp/of.c | 20 +------------------- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c >>>> index aa75a1caf08a3..9573facce53a5 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/opp/of.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c >>>> @@ -201,17 +201,6 @@ static void _opp_table_alloc_required_tables(struct opp_table *opp_table, >>>> lazy = true; >>>> continue; >>>> } >>>> - >>>> - /* >>>> - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, >>>> - * as we don't know how much about other cases. Error out if the >>>> - * required OPP doesn't belong to a genpd. >>>> - */ >>>> - if (!required_opp_tables[i]->is_genpd) { >>>> - dev_err(dev, "required-opp doesn't belong to genpd: %pOF\n", >>>> - required_np); >>>> - goto free_required_tables; >>>> - } >>>> } >>>> >>>> /* Let's do the linking later on */ >>>> @@ -379,13 +368,6 @@ static void lazy_link_required_opp_table(struct opp_table *new_table) >>>> struct dev_pm_opp *opp; >>>> int i, ret; >>>> >>>> - /* >>>> - * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, >>>> - * as we don't know much about other cases. >>>> - */ >>>> - if (!new_table->is_genpd) >>>> - return; >>>> - >>>> mutex_lock(&opp_table_lock); >>>> >>>> list_for_each_entry_safe(opp_table, temp, &lazy_opp_tables, lazy) { >>>> @@ -873,7 +855,7 @@ static struct dev_pm_opp *_opp_add_static_v2(struct opp_table *opp_table, >>>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >>>> >>>> ret = _read_opp_key(new_opp, opp_table, np, &rate_not_available); >>>> - if (ret < 0 && !opp_table->is_genpd) { >>>> + if (ret < 0) { >>>> dev_err(dev, "%s: opp key field not found\n", __func__); >>>> goto free_opp; >>>> } >>> >>> Plus this and few changes to commit log. >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c >>> index e366218d6736..b335c077f215 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/opp/core.c >>> +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c >>> @@ -893,6 +893,16 @@ static int _set_required_opps(struct device *dev, >>> if (!required_opp_tables) >>> return 0; >>> >>> + /* >>> + * We only support genpd's OPPs in the "required-opps" for now, as we >>> + * don't know much about other use cases. Error out if the required OPP >>> + * doesn't belong to a genpd. >>> + */ >>> + if (unlikely(!required_opp_tables[0]->is_genpd)) { >>> + dev_err(dev, "required-opps don't belong to a genpd\n"); >>> + return -ENOENT; >>> + } >>> + >> >> If you add this checking statement, I think that >> when using dev_pm_opp_set_rate with required-opp property, it will be failed. > > Yes, that is exactly what I am trying to do here. Hsin already > confirmed that you guys won't use this API, isn't ? > > The point here is that the _set_required_opps() function only updates > the performance state of genpds today. So it won't work for you guys > anyway. The devfreq driver(exynos-bus.c) has used the dev_pm_opp_set_rate() and used the passive governor without the required-opp property. I have a plan to use the required-opp property between devfreq drivers (exynos-bus.c) with dev_pm_opp_set_rate(). I'll support them on later if this approach doesn't break the any rule of required-opp property. -- Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi Samsung Electronics ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd 2021-06-17 1:13 ` Chanwoo Choi @ 2021-06-17 3:33 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-06-17 4:09 ` Chanwoo Choi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Viresh Kumar @ 2021-06-17 3:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chanwoo Choi Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang, Viresh Kumar ), Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd, linux-pm, linux-kernel, andrew-sh . cheng On 17-06-21, 10:13, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > The devfreq driver(exynos-bus.c) has used the dev_pm_opp_set_rate() > and used the passive governor without the required-opp property. Which is fine. > I have a plan to use the required-opp property > between devfreq drivers (exynos-bus.c) with dev_pm_opp_set_rate(). > > I'll support them on later if this approach doesn't break the any > rule of required-opp property. You will be required to make some changes in core for that I am afraid. It won't work automatically. -- viresh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd 2021-06-17 3:33 ` Viresh Kumar @ 2021-06-17 4:09 ` Chanwoo Choi 2021-06-17 4:00 ` Viresh Kumar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Chanwoo Choi @ 2021-06-17 4:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang, Viresh Kumar ), Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd, linux-pm, linux-kernel, andrew-sh . cheng On 6/17/21 12:33 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 17-06-21, 10:13, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> The devfreq driver(exynos-bus.c) has used the dev_pm_opp_set_rate() >> and used the passive governor without the required-opp property. > > Which is fine. > >> I have a plan to use the required-opp property >> between devfreq drivers (exynos-bus.c) with dev_pm_opp_set_rate(). >> >> I'll support them on later if this approach doesn't break the any >> rule of required-opp property. > > You will be required to make some changes in core for that I am > afraid. It won't work automatically. Do you think that better to use clk_enable/regulator_enable directly instead of dev_pm_opp_set_rate() for using required-opp property? -- Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi Samsung Electronics ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd 2021-06-17 4:09 ` Chanwoo Choi @ 2021-06-17 4:00 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-06-17 4:27 ` Chanwoo Choi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Viresh Kumar @ 2021-06-17 4:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chanwoo Choi Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang, Viresh Kumar ), Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd, linux-pm, linux-kernel, andrew-sh . cheng On 17-06-21, 13:09, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > On 6/17/21 12:33 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 17-06-21, 10:13, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > >> The devfreq driver(exynos-bus.c) has used the dev_pm_opp_set_rate() > >> and used the passive governor without the required-opp property. > > > > Which is fine. > > > >> I have a plan to use the required-opp property > >> between devfreq drivers (exynos-bus.c) with dev_pm_opp_set_rate(). > >> > >> I'll support them on later if this approach doesn't break the any > >> rule of required-opp property. > > > > You will be required to make some changes in core for that I am > > afraid. It won't work automatically. > > Do you think that better to use clk_enable/regulator_enable directly > instead of dev_pm_opp_set_rate() for using required-opp property? No. All I am saying is that the OPP core won't work for your use case today and may need some updates. -- viresh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd 2021-06-17 4:00 ` Viresh Kumar @ 2021-06-17 4:27 ` Chanwoo Choi 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Chanwoo Choi @ 2021-06-17 4:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang, Viresh Kumar ), Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd, linux-pm, linux-kernel, andrew-sh . cheng On 6/17/21 1:00 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 17-06-21, 13:09, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> On 6/17/21 12:33 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> On 17-06-21, 10:13, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>>> The devfreq driver(exynos-bus.c) has used the dev_pm_opp_set_rate() >>>> and used the passive governor without the required-opp property. >>> >>> Which is fine. >>> >>>> I have a plan to use the required-opp property >>>> between devfreq drivers (exynos-bus.c) with dev_pm_opp_set_rate(). >>>> >>>> I'll support them on later if this approach doesn't break the any >>>> rule of required-opp property. >>> >>> You will be required to make some changes in core for that I am >>> afraid. It won't work automatically. >> >> Do you think that better to use clk_enable/regulator_enable directly >> instead of dev_pm_opp_set_rate() for using required-opp property? > > No. All I am saying is that the OPP core won't work for your use case > today and may need some updates. OK. I'll update them for this case. -- Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi Samsung Electronics ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-17 4:08 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-06-16 5:33 [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd Hsin-Yi Wang 2021-06-16 5:58 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-06-16 6:25 ` Hsin-Yi Wang 2021-06-16 7:09 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-06-16 7:55 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-06-16 8:47 ` Chanwoo Choi 2021-06-16 9:09 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-06-16 9:20 ` Hsin-Yi Wang 2021-06-17 1:13 ` Chanwoo Choi 2021-06-17 3:33 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-06-17 4:09 ` Chanwoo Choi 2021-06-17 4:00 ` Viresh Kumar 2021-06-17 4:27 ` Chanwoo Choi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).