linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
	"ccross@android.com" <ccross@android.com>,
	"olof@lixom.net" <olof@lixom.net>,
	"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V1] arm: tegra: dma: not required to move requestor when stopping.
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:57:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF178CB81E5F@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327392649-27605-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com>

Laxman Dewangan wrote at Tuesday, January 24, 2012 1:11 AM:
> It is not require to move the requestor of dma to INVALID
> option before stopping dma.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>

Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>

I know that Laxman has checked with the HW engineers, and they see no
reason to do this. I was originally worried about hung FIFOs preventing
an in-progress DMA from completely without the removed code, but according
to HW, that isn't a concern.

-- 
nvpublic


  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-24 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-24  8:10 [PATCH V1] arm: tegra: dma: not required to move requestor when stopping Laxman Dewangan
2012-01-24 20:57 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2012-01-31 11:02   ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-02-01  7:09     ` Olof Johansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF178CB81E5F@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com \
    --to=swarren@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ccross@android.com \
    --cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).