From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@suse.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: acer-wmi: refactor function has_cap
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 15:31:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74e18643-5d0a-ecad-b3c3-4b27f399d8ce@embeddedor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VdrmVgGSTeT+rzyQbKwJyseq06b6s+d8aXCvimGgL3uMQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/6/18 3:16 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 11:00 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote:
>> Refactor function has_cap in order to avoid returning integer
>> values, when instead it should return booleans.
>>
>> This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c | 5 +----
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
>> index 8952173..ff1689d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
>> @@ -672,10 +672,7 @@ static void __init find_quirks(void)
>>
>> static bool has_cap(u32 cap)
>> {
>> - if ((interface->capability & cap) != 0)
>> - return 1;
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> + return (interface->capability & cap) != 0;
>> }
>
> Thanks, as Joe mentioned even != 0 part is not needed (followed by
> unneeded parens), though I would let it be (one line is good enough to
> me) if there will be no strong preferences.
>
Oh, yeah. I like it better what Joe suggested.
Let me send v2, shortly.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-06 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-06 20:00 [PATCH] platform/x86: acer-wmi: refactor function has_cap Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-08-06 20:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-08-06 20:31 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=74e18643-5d0a-ecad-b3c3-4b27f399d8ce@embeddedor.com \
--to=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).