(Gerd Knorr cc'ed because 'git blame' says he last touched the line of code I ended up touching - if this needs other cc:'s, will somebody who knows who should review please add them?) On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:35:14 PST, Andrew Morton said: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc8/2.6.24-rc8-mm1/ This gave the NVidia binary driver indigestion: X:2772 conflicting cache attribute d0000000-d0006000 uncached<->default While researching this one and adding some debugging printk's and dump_stack()s, I found that this was caused by: [ 0.444051] reserve_mattr swapper:1 setting d0000000-d0500000 to default [ 0.444055] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 #4 [ 0.444057] [ 0.444057] Call Trace: [ 0.444065] [] ? ioremap_page_range+0x17b/0x244 [ 0.444069] [] reserve_mattr+0x91/0x27d [ 0.444072] [] __ioremap+0xe6/0x146 [ 0.444077] [] vesafb_probe+0x196/0x6b2 ... So the vesafb driver had decided to tag an even *larger* space as 'default'.. I'm *guessing* that in fact, this area should have been non-caching (since it's the video memory for the card), but nothing cared/flagged before. Pigheaded-and-probably-wrong brute-force fix that works on my laptop, but somebody who actually understands the vesafb code should check that in fact the space *should* be non-caching. Signed-off-by: Valdis Kletnieks --- linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/drivers/video/vesafb.c.dist 2007-10-09 16:31:38.000000000 -0400 +++ linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/drivers/video/vesafb.c 2008-01-20 11:11:57.000000000 -0500 @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static int __init vesafb_probe(struct pl info->pseudo_palette = info->par; info->par = NULL; - info->screen_base = ioremap(vesafb_fix.smem_start, vesafb_fix.smem_len); + info->screen_base = ioremap_nocache(vesafb_fix.smem_start, vesafb_fix.smem_len); if (!info->screen_base) { printk(KERN_ERR "vesafb: abort, cannot ioremap video memory 0x%x @ 0x%lx\n",