From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: add lockdep check before lookup_address_in_mm()
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 19:49:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7597fe2c-ce04-0e21-bd6c-4051d7d5101d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YkH7KZbamhKpCidK@google.com>
On 3/28/22 20:15, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> lookup_address_in_mm() walks the host page table as if it is a
>> sequence of_static_ memory chunks. This is clearly dangerous.
> Yeah, it's broken. The proper fix is do something like what perf uses, or maybe
> just genericize and reuse the code from commit 8af26be06272
> ("perf/core: Fix arch_perf_get_page_size()).
>
Indeed, KVM could use perf_get_pgtable_size(). The conversion from the
result of *_leaf_size() to level is basically (ctz(size) - 12) / 9.
Alternatively, there are the three difference between
perf_get_page_size() and lookup_address_in_pgd():
* the *_offset_lockless() macros, which are unnecessary on x86
* READ_ONCE, which is important but in practice unlikely to make a
difference
* local_irq_{save,restore} around the walk
The last is the important one and it should be added to
lookup_address_in_pgd().
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-26 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-27 20:58 [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: add lockdep check before lookup_address_in_mm() Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-28 15:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-28 17:41 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-28 18:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-26 17:19 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-04-26 17:49 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-04-26 18:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-26 18:48 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-04-27 1:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27 1:24 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-04-27 1:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27 2:56 ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-04-27 14:08 ` Sean Christopherson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-27 20:35 Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-27 20:43 ` Mingwei Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7597fe2c-ce04-0e21-bd6c-4051d7d5101d@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).