linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: add lockdep check before lookup_address_in_mm()
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 19:49:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7597fe2c-ce04-0e21-bd6c-4051d7d5101d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YkH7KZbamhKpCidK@google.com>

On 3/28/22 20:15, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> lookup_address_in_mm() walks the host page table as if it is a
>> sequence of_static_  memory chunks. This is clearly dangerous.
> Yeah, it's broken.  The proper fix is do something like what perf uses, or maybe
> just genericize and reuse the code from commit 8af26be06272
> ("perf/core: Fix arch_perf_get_page_size()).
> 

Indeed, KVM could use perf_get_pgtable_size().  The conversion from the 
result of *_leaf_size() to level is basically (ctz(size) - 12) / 9.

Alternatively, there are the three difference between 
perf_get_page_size() and lookup_address_in_pgd():

* the *_offset_lockless() macros, which are unnecessary on x86

* READ_ONCE, which is important but in practice unlikely to make a 
difference

* local_irq_{save,restore} around the walk


The last is the important one and it should be added to 
lookup_address_in_pgd().

Paolo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-26 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-27 20:58 [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: add lockdep check before lookup_address_in_mm() Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-28 15:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-28 17:41   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-28 18:15     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-26 17:19       ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-04-26 17:49       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-04-26 18:10         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-26 18:48           ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-04-27  1:16             ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27  1:24               ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-04-27  1:30                 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27  2:56                   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-04-27 14:08                     ` Sean Christopherson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-27 20:35 Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-27 20:43 ` Mingwei Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7597fe2c-ce04-0e21-bd6c-4051d7d5101d@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).