From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751470AbdARXy1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:54:27 -0500 Received: from nm6-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.166]:59396 "EHLO nm6-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347AbdARXyZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:54:25 -0500 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 296377.91948.bm@smtp203.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: tykDExwVM1m3pXL5QiEBUx85PaIfsupTKgeJeAdWI1mYHuK S2ws2xxSST_2THMQ6LUu72pdArej8QE362sehgNcFKxCb1IiTBS5HrTHnP9x eZxWteFc5Y90lNRr_LN5yAjpIoYP0zsfI_jBoWp0VTk8R3h4SGsJonRPDfcw kv_JmaslTU6txR3ZHUx_.C4wC5xH9_5gSMUCbdPrL0tO.VJKwxg0k0fy_T.q iKWYiHQ3jKLNBbekP5gRvE5cuUNNmWLk0OUM_WJexYOyaRYObAVbGDLQG0X1 FSMGSOxZFb643rebCdZnuX6KFUd4VhgpeoW1bxp57SmZ2FP5HrO0m1vm0Le5 q15GfA5u2dBMRRNDfqOQ3.ISF6212CS3_knhPNfk1q5dYtXx_FqJyXkXtlwI Z5oduDwQFmQwo_21DRbKeEonST6Voft4cRIststDkEQImrDKaYmK9ieMR30i C7gf7NN41Ld_sbeQVa3AcsZiPBDTsbDGvN3RUHML4lVFehIE9PF.vZQo25pN vfmqfRWHU_43ccox2.kGTF1yrO27nUUcE09UI.9Vlgt4njRdLdY8nBrg- X-Yahoo-SMTP: OIJXglSswBDfgLtXluJ6wiAYv6_cnw-- Subject: Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add /sys/kernel/security/lsm To: James Morris References: <6cfbf7e2-fe04-567b-2b33-7233763924a4@schaufler-ca.com> Cc: LSM , John Johansen , Paul Moore , Kees Cook , Stephen Smalley , Tetsuo Handa , LKLM , Casey Schaufler From: Casey Schaufler Message-ID: <76235352-9a34-645d-db40-79c2a4a0be63@schaufler-ca.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:52:42 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/18/2017 3:29 PM, James Morris wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Casey Schaufler wrote: > >> Subject: [PATCH] LSM: Add /sys/kernel/security/lsm >> >> I am still tired of having to find indirect ways to determine >> what security modules are active on a system. I have added >> /sys/kernel/security/lsm, which contains a comma separated >> list of the active secuirty modules. No more groping around >> in /proc/filesystems or other clever hacks. >> >> Unchanged from previous versions except for being updated >> to the latest security next branch. >> > This doesn't apply cleanly to my tree. The AppArmor changes that you've added since you pulled rc3 introduced some offset issues. Should I update my patch to reflect them, or do you want to resolve the conflict? I don't much care either way. Just let me know.