linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
To: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Cc: gustavoars@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	syzbot+b718ec84a87b7e73ade4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] hfs: add lock nesting notation to hfs_find_init
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 12:33:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <763B3E9F-1D48-4D0E-830C-8260D2329627@dubeyko.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210629144803.62541-4-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>



> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:48 AM, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Syzbot reports a possible recursive lock:
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=f007ef1d7a31a469e3be7aeb0fde0769b18585db
> 
> This happens due to missing lock nesting information. From the logs,
> we see that a call to hfs_fill_super is made to mount the hfs
> filesystem. While searching for the root inode, the lock on the
> catalog btree is grabbed. Then, when the parent of the root isn't
> found, a call to __hfs_bnode_create is made to create the parent of
> the root. This eventually leads to a call to hfs_ext_read_extent which
> grabs a lock on the extents btree.
> 
> Since the order of locking is catalog btree -> extents btree, this
> lock hierarchy does not lead to a deadlock.
> 
> To tell lockdep that this locking is safe, we add nesting notation to
> distinguish between catalog btrees, extents btrees, and attributes
> btrees (for HFS+). This has already been done in hfsplus.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+b718ec84a87b7e73ade4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/hfs/bfind.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> fs/hfs/btree.h |  7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/hfs/bfind.c b/fs/hfs/bfind.c
> index 4af318fbda77..ef9498a6e88a 100644
> --- a/fs/hfs/bfind.c
> +++ b/fs/hfs/bfind.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,19 @@ int hfs_find_init(struct hfs_btree *tree, struct hfs_find_data *fd)
> 	fd->key = ptr + tree->max_key_len + 2;
> 	hfs_dbg(BNODE_REFS, "find_init: %d (%p)\n",
> 		tree->cnid, __builtin_return_address(0));
> -	mutex_lock(&tree->tree_lock);
> +	switch (tree->cnid) {
> +	case HFS_CAT_CNID:
> +		mutex_lock_nested(&tree->tree_lock, CATALOG_BTREE_MUTEX);
> +		break;
> +	case HFS_EXT_CNID:
> +		mutex_lock_nested(&tree->tree_lock, EXTENTS_BTREE_MUTEX);
> +		break;
> +	case HFS_ATTR_CNID:
> +		mutex_lock_nested(&tree->tree_lock, ATTR_BTREE_MUTEX);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> diff --git a/fs/hfs/btree.h b/fs/hfs/btree.h
> index 4ba45caf5939..0e6baee93245 100644
> --- a/fs/hfs/btree.h
> +++ b/fs/hfs/btree.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,13 @@ typedef int (*btree_keycmp)(const btree_key *, const btree_key *);
> 
> #define NODE_HASH_SIZE  256
> 
> +/* B-tree mutex nested subclasses */
> +enum hfs_btree_mutex_classes {
> +	CATALOG_BTREE_MUTEX,
> +	EXTENTS_BTREE_MUTEX,
> +	ATTR_BTREE_MUTEX,
> +};
> +
> /* A HFS BTree held in memory */
> struct hfs_btree {
> 	struct super_block *sb;
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>

Thanks,
Slava.



      reply	other threads:[~2021-06-29 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-29 14:48 [PATCH 0/3] hfs: fix various errors Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-06-29 14:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] hfs: add missing clean-up in hfs_fill_super Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-06-29 19:13   ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2021-06-30  4:50     ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-06-30 16:49       ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2021-06-29 14:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] hfs: fix high memory mapping in hfs_bnode_read Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-06-29 19:31   ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2021-06-30  2:36     ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-06-29 14:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] hfs: add lock nesting notation to hfs_find_init Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-06-29 19:33   ` Viacheslav Dubeyko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=763B3E9F-1D48-4D0E-830C-8260D2329627@dubeyko.com \
    --to=slava@dubeyko.com \
    --cc=desmondcheongzx@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=syzbot+b718ec84a87b7e73ade4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 3/3] hfs: add lock nesting notation to hfs_find_init' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).