From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FB2C2D0E4 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:47:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE9320825 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="CcrXe7Ms" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726795AbgKLTrd (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:47:33 -0500 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:41110 "EHLO aserp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726295AbgKLTrc (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:47:32 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0ACJTxtv195978; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:47:25 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=HGMviIuFYUKlCN0Vin6GjuHkG8HPDmS2g5OiyzHRioA=; b=CcrXe7MsL4Qy049GnDlcLAg44VnZUBZzzbetOdTMmX4bV8J9KbO7GrK5Xv0vNmsyZEbb qttDWZBXfSZBTjZVJL7xgLc8waZXpc6EQ2mPxhbeG6sfmVkk0j2oHUAsnzJyn8fyRiM0 3Y+h2WlHdI1poHwSDbrK3fzVT/Gby13dBjq2NGzTIJq/Q8DaJkRO/iR4CrGNNg393mBC 08XU0mLSMOHeorw/Ri/trfOoacROs7UDp1wOVm7mM0Dst5mK2lO+9OW1prGuugKmnNvW /WhxdbezeYDVT5YoXrYkC9hevmh0kTle2jelaNbaswZk4Huq/vpbBsMadloBgdnYOQCN BA== Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 34nh3b7h9f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:47:24 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0ACJVKQr117478; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:47:24 GMT Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 34p55rsyxb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:47:24 +0000 Received: from abhmp0016.oracle.com (abhmp0016.oracle.com [141.146.116.22]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 0ACJlMfX030632; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:47:22 GMT Received: from [10.74.105.253] (/10.74.105.253) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:47:22 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/25] soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: Remove set but unchecked variable 'ret' To: Lee Jones Cc: Tero Kristo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Santosh Shilimkar , tomi.valkeinen@ti.com, kishon@ti.com, dmurphy@ti.com, s-anna@ti.com References: <20201103152838.1290217-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20201103152838.1290217-7-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20201112103130.GD1997862@dell> <30ad256b-07f0-f01e-ec4f-c12cf9dbe426@ti.com> <20201112132145.GI1997862@dell> <28b506c0-df0d-c100-8d92-f3051f61cd98@oracle.com> <20201112190202.GN1997862@dell> From: santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com Organization: Oracle Corporation Message-ID: <764d71c8-447b-80dd-c46f-bdaf729b5a7a@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:47:20 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201112190202.GN1997862@dell> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9803 signatures=668682 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2011120116 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9803 signatures=668682 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2011120116 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/12/20 11:02 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com wrote: > >> On 11/12/20 5:21 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, Tero Kristo wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/11/2020 12:31, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>> Cc:ing a few people I know. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 03 Nov 2020, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): >>>>>> >>>>>> drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c: In function ‘knav_setup_queue_pools’: >>>>>> drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c:1310:6: warning: variable ‘ret’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] >>>>>> >>>>>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar >>>>>> Cc: Sandeep Nair >>>>>> Cc: Cyril Chemparathy >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones >>>>>> --- >>>>>> drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c | 3 +-- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> Any idea who will take these TI patches? >>>>> >>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201111052540.GH173948@builder.lan/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KEeMCT-GwmLNnDFCOqxnunXXiCrCpj3ZFXpiMzj55VmlOJ-FVhKmom-O7sq-CkL8s0sjAg$ >>>>> >>>> >>>> (Dropped a few inactive emails from delivery.) >>>> >>>> Santosh is the maintainer for the subsystem, so my vote would go for him. >>> >>> Thanks for your prompt reply Tero. >>> >>> It looks as though Santosh has been on Cc since the start. He must >>> just be busy. I'll give him a little while longer before submitting a >>> [RESEND]. >>> >> Go ahead and re-post. These seems to be trivial so will pick >> it up. > > If you are in receipt of the first iteration, there shouldn't be any > requirement for a [RESEND]. Unless you deleted them from your inbox? > I haven't deleted anything. I thought you are going to repost based on "I'll give him a little while longer before submitting a [RESEND]" :-) Regards, Santosh Regards, Santosh