LKML Archive on
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Georgi Djakov <>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <>
Cc: Linux PM list <>,
	"" <>,
	Viresh Kumar <>,
	Bjorn Andersson <>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] interconnect changes for 5.5
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 13:44:05 +0200
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On 8.11.19 г. 12:39 ч., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 05:42:13PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>> On 11/7/19 16:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 02:46:53PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>>>> Hi Greg,
>>>> This is a pull request with interconnect patches for the 5.5 merge window.
>>>> All patches have been for a while in linux-next without reported issues. The
>>>> details are in the signed tag. Please consider pulling into char-misc-next.
>>> I don't know about
>>> 0003-interconnect-Disallow-interconnect-core-to-be-built-.patch here.
>>> Shouldn't you just fix up the dependancies of subsystems that rely on
>>> this?  We are moving more and more to kernels that "just work" with
>>> everything as modules, even on arm64 systems.  So forbiding the
>>> interconnect code from being able to be built as a module does not feel
>>> good to me at all.
>> Thank you for commenting on this! The initial idea was to keep everything as
>> modular as possible. The reasons behind this change is that other core
>> frameworks like cpufreq (and possibly others) want to call the interconnect
>> APIs. Some of these frameworks are built-in only and it would be easier to
>> handle dependencies if interconnect core built-in too. Now each user that
>> can be built-in has to specify in Kconfig that it depends on INTERCONNECT ||
> That's fine, when those subsystems start to use those apis, that
> dependency needs to be added.  Nothing new here, and you forcing it to
> either be "on or off" isn't going to change that.  Let's do it correctly
> please.

Alright! That matches with what we do today. Thanks for the guidance!


  reply index

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-07 12:46 Georgi Djakov
2019-11-07 14:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-07 15:42   ` Georgi Djakov
2019-11-08 10:39     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-08 11:44       ` Georgi Djakov [this message]
2019-11-09  1:36       ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-11-09  8:48         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-09 20:27           ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-11-10 10:16             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-11  4:54               ` Viresh Kumar
2019-11-11  5:26                 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-14  8:41               ` Viresh Kumar
2019-11-14 12:59                 ` Georgi Djakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

LKML Archive on

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/1.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/2.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/3.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/4.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/5.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/6.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/7.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/8.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ \
	public-inbox-index lkml

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone