linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v5] f2fs: fix performance issue observed with multi-thread sequential read
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 11:30:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <782a0bae-a398-9afe-745e-cca31e8fc8e8@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180821023626.GB20263@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com>

On 2018/8/21 10:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This reverts the commit - "b93f771 - f2fs: remove writepages lock"
> to fix the drop in sequential read throughput.
> 
> Test: ./tiotest -t 32 -d /data/tio_tmp -f 32 -b 524288 -k 1 -k 3 -L
> device: UFS
> 
> Before -
> read throughput: 185 MB/s
> total read requests: 85177 (of these ~80000 are 4KB size requests).
> total write requests: 2546 (of these ~2208 requests are written in 512KB).
> 
> After -
> read throughput: 758 MB/s
> total read requests: 2417 (of these ~2042 are 512KB reads).
> total write requests: 2701 (of these ~2034 requests are written in 512KB).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
> Change log from v4:
>  - add __should_serialize_io
>  - fix wrong condition
> 
>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs |  8 ++++++++
>  fs/f2fs/data.c                          | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h                          |  2 ++
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c                       |  1 +
>  fs/f2fs/super.c                         |  1 +
>  fs/f2fs/sysfs.c                         |  2 ++
>  6 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> index 9b0123388f18..94a24aedcdb2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> @@ -51,6 +51,14 @@ Description:
>  		 Controls the dirty page count condition for the in-place-update
>  		 policies.
>  
> +What:		/sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/min_seq_blocks
> +Date:		August 2018
> +Contact:	"Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> +Description:
> +		 Controls the dirty page count condition for batched sequential
> +		 writes in ->writepages.
> +
> +
>  What:		/sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/min_hot_blocks
>  Date:		March 2017
>  Contact:	"Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 43d3723dc886..bdcb023506a7 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -2122,6 +2122,18 @@ static int f2fs_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool __should_serialize_io(struct inode *inode,
> +					struct writeback_control *wbc)
> +{
> +	if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))

Good catch! Will be better. :)

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>

Thanks,


      reply	other threads:[~2018-08-21  3:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-10  2:37 [PATCH] f2fs: fix performance issue observed with multi-thread sequential read Jaegeuk Kim
2018-08-10  2:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2018-08-10 18:56   ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] " Jaegeuk Kim
2018-08-13  2:20     ` Chao Yu
2018-08-13 20:11       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-08-14  3:49         ` Chao Yu
2018-08-14  4:04           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-08-14  6:18             ` Chao Yu
2018-08-14 17:28               ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-08-15  1:52                 ` Chao Yu
2018-08-15  2:15                   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-08-15  3:44                     ` Chao Yu
2018-08-16  1:34                       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-08-16 11:39                         ` Chao Yu
2018-08-17 18:29     ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4] " Jaegeuk Kim
2018-08-20  1:21       ` Chao Yu
2018-08-21  2:28         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-08-21  3:26           ` Chao Yu
2018-08-21  2:36       ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v5] " Jaegeuk Kim
2018-08-21  3:30         ` Chao Yu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=782a0bae-a398-9afe-745e-cca31e8fc8e8@huawei.com \
    --to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).