From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF27CC43462 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B215B60FE6 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238282AbhDVRNO (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:13:14 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f180.google.com ([209.85.215.180]:44849 "EHLO mail-pg1-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236058AbhDVRNM (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:13:12 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f180.google.com with SMTP id y32so33280833pga.11; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:12:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oL0/WcnCbHxL1yJ51DUfiDMDBwIuiDipc8mvrh5ow+4=; b=byXLXSL5+xLBTGrqnQfcZrqYoIoPEiv3qjTNvx0an3iusFSg3FU+jWvxR3F+84R3Jh 8ZwMCRrCj2oVEq30KRKEzblaPgdbmtuwgiBfiyhihwTenoHO3el164ifAUmo72KSdZ5R Xc7bE4Z+yCA5HdkEb25JRPezqNOeEIFBD9lfg7PUWTXK1JeB8Gi+l2hBMNLxNh6I+a5u OrG7QtBysFfXdiO1Hiw2o6nP+JrAK3FoTm4B0EIv+2/JLCy2eE83doczAoEWg7S9SNtk HPnu3LjRAvrzloySHKmMAR4UcFfNyGWog9xowhtwgc39QfFp6zMYcUDnt7IDG7mBb+XW B0pA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5337ZXE3K1W6EvyALR8MyFxfj3/P9yBfi33UcGObFsZJIDsCRXc2 n6GxpmoYDVK70pxAMBIrRUXtkpYwZEM+TQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypCeQEUKOtXrXBs8b2viAjaw3NbuX4UaVGriFcAl0iIo1zShVEQ8SfJJXuVETEvTpPJA0zpw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:2c14:: with SMTP id s20mr4415277pgs.72.1619111555663; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4000:d7:ca3e:c761:2ef0:61cd? ([2601:647:4000:d7:ca3e:c761:2ef0:61cd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l18sm5098991pjq.33.2021.04.22.10.12.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:12:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Have 'alloc_workqueue()' like macros accept a format specifier To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Marion et Christophe JAILLET , tj@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org References: <042f5fff-5faf-f3c5-0819-b8c8d766ede6@acm.org> <1032428026.331.1618814178946.JavaMail.www@wwinf2229> <40c21bfe-e304-230d-b319-b98063347b8b@acm.org> <20210422122419.GF2047089@ziepe.ca> From: Bart Van Assche Message-ID: <782e329a-7c3f-a0da-5d2f-89871b0c4b9b@acm.org> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:12:33 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210422122419.GF2047089@ziepe.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/22/21 5:24 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 01:02:34PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> On 4/18/21 11:36 PM, Marion et Christophe JAILLET wrote: >>> The list in To: is the one given by get_maintainer.pl. Usualy, I only >>> put the ML in Cc: I've run the script on the 2 patches of the serie >>> and merged the 2 lists. Everyone is in the To: of the cover letter >>> and of the 2 patches. >>> >>> If Théo is "Tejun Heo" ( (maintainer:WORKQUEUE) ), he is already in >>> the To: line. >> Linus wants to see a "Cc: ${maintainer}" tag in patches that he receives >> from a maintainer and that modify another subsystem than the subsystem >> maintained by that maintainer. > > Really? Do you remember a lore link for this? Last time I saw Linus mentioning this was a few months ago. Unfortunately I cannot find that message anymore. > Generally I've been junking the CC lines (vs Andrew at the other > extreme that often has 10's of CC lines) Most entries in the MAINTAINERS file have one to three email addresses so I'm surprised to read that Cc-ing maintainer(s) could result in tens of Cc lines? Thanks, Bart.