From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84B5C04AB3 for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 07:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B640420665 for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 07:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=synopsys.com header.i=@synopsys.com header.b="bq8edUN/" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726894AbfE2HvH (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2019 03:51:07 -0400 Received: from dc2-smtprelay2.synopsys.com ([198.182.61.142]:40142 "EHLO smtprelay-out1.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725895AbfE2HvH (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2019 03:51:07 -0400 Received: from mailhost.synopsys.com (dc2-mailhost1.synopsys.com [10.12.135.161]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtprelay-out1.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCA33C1E97; Wed, 29 May 2019 07:50:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=synopsys.com; s=mail; t=1559116250; bh=O4m8Slnem2aqPN5cvF04pcHB8VJrzCkhF42k8NlkGos=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bq8edUN/z7Se1ooSC7xpybCBbiM8riMcrnNHAosyXjpMmgLGT/9lmpi3/JuPing52 16uLpEaVfiaSJfu4OhLnY2YXq/FYcgx0DLPj2CPZiXeHtBSG3wlszQvQfNBPFhihTk IBJ7Mh9vw5Yz6IAugBFBlOo1GaXVcKI4OdeV0+HIKCdqYAAjig+Znw5sKq0gpng4eE 6wTF+LcV/n+MOsZaP5syH5WFcb2Qtv2FUZHEsB3ka5Hsi61fsDeQueOLyuukcJg4Ra GNGcIOlK4Cnch4qAt9l4ZFUZ1lWo93NKQsUBJBY904K8F1CCozxqlmUDzyyaKgB5QR Iwi0h7tsNTbcg== Received: from us01wehtc1.internal.synopsys.com (us01wehtc1-vip.internal.synopsys.com [10.12.239.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailhost.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A558A009C; Wed, 29 May 2019 07:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DE02WEHTCA.internal.synopsys.com (10.225.19.92) by us01wehtc1.internal.synopsys.com (10.12.239.231) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 29 May 2019 00:51:04 -0700 Received: from DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com ([fe80::95ce:118a:8321:a099]) by DE02WEHTCA.internal.synopsys.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Wed, 29 May 2019 09:51:01 +0200 From: Jose Abreu To: Voon Weifeng , "David S. Miller" , Maxime Coquelin CC: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Giuseppe Cavallaro" , Andrew Lunn , "Florian Fainelli" , Alexandre Torgue , biao huang , Ong Boon Leong , Kweh Hock Leong Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] net: stmmac: enable EHL SGMII Thread-Topic: [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] net: stmmac: enable EHL SGMII Thread-Index: AQHVFcTD9h9jmx1QT0W4AMzbkVV3B6aBupZQ Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 07:51:00 +0000 Message-ID: <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B932F7F@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> References: <1559125118-24324-1-git-send-email-weifeng.voon@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1559125118-24324-1-git-send-email-weifeng.voon@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.107.19.176] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Voon Weifeng Date: Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:18:33 > This patch-set is to enable Ethernet controller > (DW Ethernet QoS and DW Ethernet PCS) with SGMII interface in Elkhart Lak= e. > The DW Ethernet PCS is the Physical Coding Sublayer that is between Ether= net > MAC and PHY and uses MDIO Clause-45 as Communication. Did you rebase this series against latest net-next tree ? Because you are missing MMC module in your HWIF table entry. This module=20 was recently added with the addition of selftests. Thanks, Jose Miguel Abreu