From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1757099AbdIHUjx (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 8 Sep 2017 16:39:53 -0400
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:64476 "EHLO mout.gmx.net"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1756895AbdIHUjw (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 8 Sep 2017 16:39:52 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Fix wrong %pF and %pS printk format specifier
 usages
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <1504729681-3504-1-git-send-email-deller@gmx.de>
 <20170908062317.GB496@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
From: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <7975b790-5b1c-6df3-676d-308101d735dc@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 22:39:04 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170908062317.GB496@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:SR+VhfMA2LG0agbAKDSD47zvhCMUd0X8e3bNWx1x17fkr3UZgge
 hBZOOjFWoh7unnAYSVfhk7/myDCY9T0ZalSHcoPOXhHRwkO/3nfHD0IuMaEjvFDI2gITU8j
 8G0eqXM3FhDae8ctKTyuQHlrTrf/FM0kPj2OM0We2bksw2VHvf+AkU9Ksyh+kmcLzf9Drn4
 iR8Y9yRul6U6UjXBAWDNw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:IROfLgNvDEE=:LiiFAGRqg/ElEeQ3y6Ny4e
 YPZyl5fdWkaxGZv6U7GfA43a47u1xyu6lfDHvnbOy/t9P8swp46oiSFWaqF85LbFjjXeFnsqx
 eGfNt+0aCNnkyq12Ku8xizRf+to09TwQ3DY38DNimflb/LiQDowYKZyMQkAXfi6l0lJfjJHS5
 MXqp7XIby146nYohM+2NLOOPq0RQncdfwKlyO8baoe2mTo1ck8c7hEKQfNAagJAmmWMnlP0Nn
 +46tPgCtlSRj7tBzRdaJl6HZCOLjFURQtNcp0XnXKjFO+HBd90bMEmHCMRIJJUkvKaHH31RF5
 vB55g6vzRN02V3vKJvq0L6nmPFZs/MC2SwCMpTpMnaBaUj2TX2LPRCHdQmuDHwub9oDM+SS4/
 1Bro7yNVU6Jo+L1urLBsoWzP+9pY8KMnK+INmTPKspLAx6cPimJ77vX8u1dl9cKwWLJMOVn8L
 kXL6Dcf3kcIgFCdbupMcl07rI2UwgTmJdGYo3u8dxpx1HNv899WI7BKV5cMoYmjUOuGyO7fmv
 9LxX51GpZpwbkmJsZsTo0kwT79qqRze9B5WDzzVjpszYVE+NJem6gqyq/f2RhbhHjBXZb1PcB
 K15sxZ6YpQtDBnedPBe11EynBL+yui2+fJq8hMsFWeJOUqxUUG0UsPeBxQDdyuZsCsnlY6gfN
 EeZe5ZJZdkTNgVCo3hK6dCyRssTo/4xIzKQ5WdqovLqU2c5xmd91GPeNHJxy7n8n5GGdXqR5K
 s9ls+0XnSiQSMyUY3lLgXjaph7scLXNBZtMraF6GO9HY+gUzAnl36yUPgyEuGhfLCsD5jUml4
 lXAwbPjYB8iIBZ5Xj64wk/Jykycxff9ti58gFl6lCm9ZFQlLN4=
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 08.09.2017 08:23, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (09/06/17 22:27), Helge Deller wrote:
>> This patch series fixes the wrong usages of the %pF and %pS printk format
>> specifiers throughout the kernel code.
>>
>> Both specifiers have the same result on most architectures. But on ia64, ppc64
>> and parisc64 architectures the %pF specifier does an extra conversion because
>> there function pointers are actually function descriptors.
> 
> Helge,
> 
> did you also grep for %pf? or just for %pF?

I grepped only for %pF and %pS.
There might be wrong %ps/%pf usages too.

Helge