linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	syzbot <syzbot+7a8ba368b47fdefca61e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in path_lookupat
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 23:41:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <79dfc903-cf0d-0091-ef96-76c2749abb9c@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjD-A_VsYC_OKcn30_ZsrLEE1CN7mnwZ803cvaFTdTTfA@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/25/2019 11:13 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 3:04 PM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
>>
>> I'm fine either way, I think the rcu_destroy_inode would indeed simplify
>> it nicely. In any case fwiw, here's what I'd have ready for standby on bpf
>> side and tested as well. Decided to get rid of bpf_evict_inode() entirely
>> since the only callback we'd really need is on final inode destruction:
> 
> Yes, this looks correct to me.
> 
> I think this is worth doing regardless. Even if we then make the vfs
> layer add that rcu_destroy_inode(), that will fit very well with this
> patch, and getting rid of the special bpf_evict_inode() logic and just
> letting the normal vfs inode cleanup happen looks like the right
> thing.
> 
> So ack from me on your
> 
>> Subject: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix use after free in bpf_evict_inode
> 
> patch regardless of what else we might end up doing in this area to
> clean things up.

Ok, thanks a lot. In that case, I just pushed this one to bpf tree, and
it will come your way the usual route via David.

Thanks,
Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-25 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-28 17:40 KASAN: use-after-free Read in path_lookupat syzbot
2019-03-25  0:44 ` syzbot
2019-03-25  1:25   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-25  1:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-25  4:57   ` Al Viro
2019-03-25  9:15     ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-03-25 11:11       ` Al Viro
2019-03-25 11:17         ` Al Viro
2019-03-25 11:21           ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-03-25 18:36     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-25 19:18       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-25 21:14         ` Al Viro
2019-03-25 21:45           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-25 22:04             ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-03-25 22:13               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-25 22:41                 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2019-03-25 22:49               ` Al Viro
2019-03-25 23:37             ` Al Viro
2019-03-25 23:44               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-03-26  0:21                 ` Al Viro
2019-03-26  1:38               ` ceph: fix use-after-free on symlink traversal Al Viro
2019-03-26  1:39                 ` jffs2: " Al Viro
2019-03-26  1:40                 ` ubifs: " Al Viro
2019-03-26  1:43                 ` debugfs: " Al Viro
2019-03-26 10:41                 ` ceph: " Jeff Layton
2019-03-26 11:38                 ` Ilya Dryomov
2019-03-26  1:45               ` KASAN: use-after-free Read in path_lookupat Al Viro
2019-04-10 18:11                 ` Al Viro
2019-04-10 19:44                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-25 19:43       ` Al Viro
2019-03-25 22:48         ` Dave Chinner
2019-03-25 23:02           ` Al Viro
     [not found]             ` <CAGe7X7mb=gK7zhSwmT_6mmmkcbjhZAOb=wj31BdUcHkNUPsm2Q@mail.gmail.com>
2019-03-26  4:15               ` Al Viro
2019-03-27 16:58                 ` Jan Kara
2019-03-27 18:59                   ` Al Viro
2019-03-28  9:00                     ` Jan Kara
2019-03-27 17:22             ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=79dfc903-cf0d-0091-ef96-76c2749abb9c@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+7a8ba368b47fdefca61e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).