Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: rawnand: Add NAND controller support on Intel LGM SoC

["Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>]

Hi Boris,

   Thank you very much for the review comments and your time...

On 18/4/2020 4:55 pm, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:21:47 +0800
> "Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX"
> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> This patch adds the new IP of Nand Flash Controller(NFC) support
>> on Intel's Lightning Mountain(LGM) SoC.
>>
>> DMA is used for burst data transfer operation, also DMA HW supports
>> aligned 32bit memory address and aligned data access by default.
>> DMA burst of 8 supported. Data register used to support the read/write
>> operation from/to device.
>>
>> NAND controller driver implements ->exec_op() to replace legacy hooks,
>> these specific call-back method to execute NAND operations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig          |   7 +
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Makefile         |   1 +
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/raw/intel_lgm_nand.c | 740 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> I wonder if we shouldn't name the driver infineon-nand-controller.c
> since the original design comes from Infineon IIUC. intel_lgm_nand.c is
> definitely misleading, as we also have a nand_intel.c file which is for
> Intel NAND chips (not NAND controllers). If we keep intel in the name,
> let's at least add a "-controller" suffix to make it clear.
sure , will add -controller suffix.
>
> Side note for Miquel: I guess we would also benefit from having a clear
> core vs controller-drivers split as recently done for spi-nor (a
> controller subdir has been created).
>
>>   3 files changed, 748 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/intel_lgm_nand.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig
>> index a80a46bb5b8b..9efc4bbaf4a3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig
>> @@ -457,6 +457,13 @@ config MTD_NAND_CADENCE
>>   	  Enable the driver for NAND flash on platforms using a Cadence NAND
>>   	  controller.
>>   
>> +config MTD_NAND_INTEL_LGM
>> +	tristate "Support for NAND controller on Intel LGM SoC"
>> +	depends on X86
> Do we have a hard dependency on x86 here? Maybe 'depends on HAS_MMIO'
> would be enough.
yes Boris, we have hard dependency on x86.
>> +	help
>> +	  Enables support for NAND Flash chips on Intel's LGM SoC.
>> +          NAND flash interfaced through the External Bus Unit.
>> +
>>   comment "Misc"
>>   
>>   config MTD_SM_COMMON
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Makefile
>> index 2d136b158fb7..49a301ae0c9d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Makefile
>> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_TEGRA)		+= tegra_nand.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_STM32_FMC2)	+= stm32_fmc2_nand.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_MESON)		+= meson_nand.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_CADENCE)		+= cadence-nand-controller.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_INTEL_LGM)	+= intel_lgm_nand.o
>>   
>>   nand-objs := nand_base.o nand_legacy.o nand_bbt.o nand_timings.o nand_ids.o
>>   nand-objs += nand_onfi.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/intel_lgm_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/intel_lgm_nand.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..96cd1831f070
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/intel_lgm_nand.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2019 Intel Corporation. */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/completion.h>
>> +#include <linux/dmaengine.h>
>> +#include <linux/dma-direction.h>
>> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/resource.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
>> +#include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
>> +#include <linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/mtd/partitions.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <mtd/mtd-abi.h>
>> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>> +#include <linux/mtd/nand.h>
>> +
>> +#define LGM_CLC			0x000
>> +#define LGM_CLC_RST		0x00000000u
>> +
>> +#define LGM_NAND_ECC_OFFSET	0x008
>> +
>> +#define LGM_ADDR_SEL(n)		(0x20 + (n) * 4)
>> +#define LGM_ADDR_MASK		(5 << 4)
>> +#define LGM_ADDR_SEL_REGEN	0x1
>> +
>> +#define LGM_BUSCON(n)		(0x60 + (n) * 4)
>> +#define LGM_BUSCON_CMULT_V4	0x1
>> +#define LGM_BUSCON_RECOVC(n)	((n) << 2)
>> +#define LGM_BUSCON_HOLDC(n)	((n) << 4)
>> +#define LGM_BUSCON_WAITRDC(n)	((n) << 6)
>> +#define LGM_BUSCON_WAITWRC(n)	((n) << 8)
>> +#define LGM_BUSCON_BCGEN_CS	0x0
>> +#define LGM_BUSCON_SETUP_EN	BIT(22)
>> +#define LGM_BUSCON_ALEC		0xC000
>> +
> Hm, I'm pretty sure we don't need the LGM_ prefix here.
Agreed!, will replace EBU_ prefix to LGM_
>> +#define NAND_CON		0x0B0
>> +#define NAND_CON_NANDM_EN	BIT(0)
>> +#define NAND_CON_NANDM_DIS	0x0
>> +#define NAND_CON_CSMUX_E_EN	BIT(1)
>> +#define NAND_CON_ALE_P_LOW	BIT(2)
>> +#define NAND_CON_CLE_P_LOW	BIT(3)
>> +#define NAND_CON_CS_P_LOW	BIT(4)
>> +#define NAND_CON_SE_P_LOW	BIT(5)
>> +#define NAND_CON_WP_P_LOW	BIT(6)
>> +#define NAND_CON_PRE_P_LOW	BIT(7)
>> +#define NAND_CON_IN_CS_S(n)	((n) << 8)
>> +#define NAND_CON_OUT_CS_S(n)	((n) << 10)
>> +#define NAND_CON_LAT_EN_CS_P	((0x3D) << 18)
>> +
>> +#define NAND_WAIT		0x0B4
>> +#define NAND_WAIT_RDBY		BIT(0)
>> +#define NAND_WAIT_WR_C		BIT(3)
>> +
>> +#define NAND_CTL1		0x110
>> +#define NAND_CTL1_ADDR_3_SHIFT	24
>> +
>> +#define NAND_CTL2		0x114
>> +#define NAND_CTL2_ADDR_5_SHIFT	8
>> +#define NAND_CTL2_CYC_N_V5	(0x2 << 16)
>> +
>> +#define NAND_INT_MSK_CTL	0x124
>> +#define NAND_INT_MSK_CTL_WR_C	BIT(4)
>> +
>> +#define NAND_INT_STA		0x128
>> +#define NAND_INT_STA_WR_C	BIT(4)
>> +
>> +#define NAND_CTL		0x130
>> +#define NAND_CTL_MODE_ECC	0x1
>> +#define NAND_CTL_GO		BIT(2)
>> +#define NAND_CTL_CE_SEL_CS(n)	BIT(3 + (n))
>> +#define NAND_CTL_RW_READ	0x0
>> +#define NAND_CTL_RW_WRITE	BIT(10)
>> +#define NAND_CTL_ECC_OFF_V8TH	BIT(11)
>> +#define NAND_CTL_CKFF_EN	0x0
>> +#define NAND_CTL_MSG_EN		BIT(17)
>> +
>> +#define NAND_PARA0		0x13c
>> +#define NAND_PARA0_PAGE_V8192	0x3
>> +#define NAND_PARA0_PIB_V256	(0x3 << 4)
>> +#define NAND_PARA0_BYP_EN_NP	0x0
>> +#define NAND_PARA0_BYP_DEC_NP	0x0
>> +#define NAND_PARA0_TYPE_ONFI	BIT(18)
>> +#define NAND_PARA0_ADEP_EN	BIT(21)
>> +
>> +#define NAND_CMSG_0		0x150
>> +#define NAND_CMSG_1		0x154
>> +
>> +#define NAND_WRITE_CMD		(NAND_CON_CS_P_LOW | NAND_CON_CLE_P_LOW)
>> +#define NAND_WRITE_ADDR		(NAND_CON_CS_P_LOW | NAND_CON_ALE_P_LOW)
> I would redefine ALE, CLE and CS here instead of re-using the NAND_CON
> definitions. Even if they have the same value they represent different
> things I think. One is encoding the signal polarity when configuring
> the NAND controller, and the other one is an offset in the memory bus
> MMIO range that's used to control the CLE/ALE/CS signals.
Noted, will update.
>
> #define NAND_ALE_OFFS			BIT(2)
> #define NAND_CLE_OFFS			BIT(3)
> #define NAND_CS_OFFS			BIT(4)
>
>> +#define NAND_WRITE_DATA		NAND_CON_CS_P_LOW
>> +#define NAND_READ_DATA		NAND_CON_CS_P_LOW
> Can we not hide that behind macros. And there's no point having 2
> different definitions for read/write, since all they do is keeping the
> CS line asserted, the direction is selection by the operation done on
> the bus (read or write). BTW, you even mix those without realizing the
> mistake in your implementation :P.
Sure, do optimization with single macro
>
>> +
>> +#define NAND_CHIP_NO_SELECTION	-1
>> +#define NAND_CHIP_SELECTION	0x0
>> +
>> +struct lgm_nand_host {
> infineon_nand_controller?
better we keep intel_nand_controller , is it okay?
>> +	struct nand_controller	controller;
>> +	struct nand_chip	chip;
>> +	void __iomem		*lgm_va;
>> +	void __iomem		*hsnand_va;
>> +	void __iomem		*nandaddr_va;
> You can drop the _va suffixes and pick names describing what's exposed
> by the MMIO range (lgm doesn't sounds like a good name to me).
Noted, will pick the proper name
>> +	struct clk		*clk;
>> +	unsigned long		clk_rate;
>> +	u32			cs;
>> +	u32			nd_para0;
>> +	struct device		*dev;
>> +	struct dma_chan		*dma_tx;
>> +	struct dma_chan		*dma_rx;
>> +	struct completion	dma_access_complete;
>> +	const char *cs_name;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static u8 lgm_nand_readb(struct nand_chip *chip, int op)
> Make op an unsigned int.
okay, noted.
>> +{
>> +	struct lgm_nand_host *lgm_host = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
>> +	void __iomem *nand_wait = lgm_host->lgm_va + NAND_WAIT;
>> +	u32 stat;
>> +	int ret;
>> +	u8 val;
>> +
>> +	val = readb(lgm_host->nandaddr_va + op);
>> +
>> +	ret = readl_poll_timeout(nand_wait, stat, stat & NAND_WAIT_WR_C,
>> +				 20, 1000);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		dev_warn(lgm_host->dev,
>> +			 "lgm nand write timeout. nand_wait(0x%p)=0x%x\n",
>> +			 nand_wait, readl(nand_wait));
>> +
>> +	return val;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void lgm_nand_writeb(struct nand_chip *chip, int op, u8 value)
>> +{
>> +	struct lgm_nand_host *lgm_host = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
>> +	void __iomem *nand_wait = lgm_host->lgm_va + NAND_WAIT;
>> +	u32 stat;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	writeb(value, lgm_host->nandaddr_va + op);
> Looks like NAND_CON_CS_P_LOW is always set, so no need to force the
> caller to pass it in op.
Agreed!
>> +
>> +	ret = readl_poll_timeout(nand_wait, stat, stat & NAND_WAIT_WR_C,
>> +				 20, 1000);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		dev_warn(lgm_host->dev,
>> +			 "lgm nand write timeout. nand_wait(0x%p)=0x%x\n",
>> +			 nand_wait, readl(nand_wait));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned char lgm_read_byte(struct nand_chip *chip)
>> +{
>> +	return lgm_nand_readb(chip, NAND_READ_DATA);
>> +}
> This one should not be needed.
Good catch , will drop it.
>> +
>> +static void lgm_read_buf(struct nand_chip *chip, u_char *buf, int len)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
>> +		buf[i] = lgm_nand_readb(chip, NAND_WRITE_DATA);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void lgm_write_buf(struct nand_chip *chip, const u_char *buf, int len)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
>> +		lgm_nand_writeb(chip, NAND_WRITE_DATA, buf[i]);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void lgm_select_chip(struct nand_chip *chip, int select)
>> +{
>> +	struct lgm_nand_host *lgm_host = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
>> +	void __iomem *nand_con = lgm_host->lgm_va + NAND_CON;
>> +	u32 cs = lgm_host->cs;
>> +	int val;
>> +
>> +	switch (select) {
>> +	case NAND_CHIP_NO_SELECTION:
>> +		val = readl(nand_con);
>> +		writel(val & ~NAND_CON_NANDM_EN, nand_con);
>> +		break;
> Please move that to an unselect_chip() function. I also see that this
> function is never called with NAND_CHIP_NO_SELECTION. Oh, and you don't
> need the select argument since you only support one CS per chip.
Sure , will update as per single chip selection support.
>
>> +	case NAND_CHIP_SELECTION:
>> +		writel(NAND_CON_NANDM_EN | NAND_CON_CSMUX_E_EN |
>> +		       NAND_CON_CS_P_LOW | NAND_CON_SE_P_LOW |
>> +		       NAND_CON_WP_P_LOW | NAND_CON_PRE_P_LOW |
>> +		       NAND_CON_IN_CS_S(cs) | NAND_CON_OUT_CS_S(cs) |
>> +		       NAND_CON_LAT_EN_CS_P, nand_con);
>> +		break;
>> +	default:
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int lgm_dev_ready(struct nand_chip *chip)
>> +{
>> +	struct lgm_nand_host *lgm_host = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
>> +
>> +	return readl(lgm_host->lgm_va + NAND_WAIT) & NAND_WAIT_RDBY;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void lgm_cmd_ctrl(struct nand_chip *chip, int cmd, unsigned int ctrl)
>> +{
>> +	if (cmd == NAND_CMD_NONE)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (ctrl & NAND_CLE)
>> +		lgm_nand_writeb(chip, NAND_WRITE_CMD, cmd);
>> +	else if (ctrl & NAND_ALE)
>> +		lgm_nand_writeb(chip, NAND_WRITE_ADDR, cmd);
>> +}
> Looks like you're still sticking to the old cmd_ctrl() interface.
> Please inline what can be inlined in exec_op() (everything that's
> related to CMD/ADDR cycle emission) and add helpers for the read/write
> data logic.
Yes, Your are right, function definition need to be updated and aligned 
with exec_op() based definitions
>> +
>> +static int lgm_nand_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
>> +				  struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
>> +{
>> +	struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
>> +
>> +	if (section)
>> +		return -ERANGE;
>> +
>> +	oobregion->offset = LGM_NAND_ECC_OFFSET;
>> +	oobregion->length = chip->ecc.total;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int lgm_nand_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
>> +				   struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
>> +{
>> +	struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
>> +
>> +	if (section)
>> +		return -ERANGE;
>> +
>> +	oobregion->offset = chip->ecc.total + LGM_NAND_ECC_OFFSET;
>> +	oobregion->length = mtd->oobsize - oobregion->offset;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops lgm_nand_ooblayout_ops = {
>> +	.ecc = lgm_nand_ooblayout_ecc,
>> +	.free = lgm_nand_ooblayout_free,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static inline struct lgm_nand_host *nand_to_lgm(struct nand_chip *chip)
>> +{
>> +	return container_of(chip, struct lgm_nand_host, chip);
>> +}
> Please move that function next to the struct definition, and you can
> drop the inline specifier, the compiler should be smart enough to
> inline it anyway.
Noted, will move next to structure  and also drop inline.
>> +static int lgm_nand_exec_op(struct nand_chip *chip,
>> +			    const struct nand_operation *op, bool check_only)
>> +{
>> +	struct lgm_nand_host *host = nand_to_lgm(chip);
>> +	const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
>> +	unsigned int op_id;
>> +	int i, ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	for (op_id = 0; op_id < op->ninstrs; op_id++) {
>> +		instr = &op->instrs[op_id];
>> +
>> +		lgm_select_chip(chip, host->cs);
> Should be moved before the for() loop (no need to select the chip
> every time you excute an instruction).
Good catch, Thanks!
>> +
>> +		switch (instr->type) {
>> +		case NAND_OP_CMD_INSTR:
>> +			lgm_cmd_ctrl(chip, instr->ctx.cmd.opcode, NAND_CLE);
> 			lgm_nand_writeb(chip, NAND_CLE_OFFS,
> 					instr->ctx.cmd.opcode);	
>
>> +		break;
> Missing tab here^.
Noted.
>> +
>> +		case NAND_OP_ADDR_INSTR:
>> +			for (i = 0; i < instr->ctx.addr.naddrs; i++)
>> +				lgm_cmd_ctrl(chip, instr->ctx.addr.addrs[i],
>> +					     NAND_ALE);
> 				lgm_nand_writeb(chip, NAND_ALE_OFFS,
> 						instr->ctx.addr.addrs[i]);
>
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		case NAND_OP_DATA_IN_INSTR:
>> +			lgm_read_buf(chip, instr->ctx.data.buf.in,
>> +				     instr->ctx.data.len);
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		case NAND_OP_DATA_OUT_INSTR:
>> +			lgm_write_buf(chip, instr->ctx.data.buf.out,
>> +				      instr->ctx.data.len);
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		case NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR:
>> +			ret = lgm_dev_ready(chip);
> That's wrong, WAITRDY should wait for the NAND_WAIT_RDBY flag to be
> set but you only check its value once.
okay, let me check and update.
>
> 			ret = readl_poll_timeout(lgm_host->lgm_va +
> 						  NAND_WAIT, status,
> 						  status & NAND_WAIT_RDBY, 20,
> 						  instr->ctx.waitrdy.timeout_ms * 1000);
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct nand_controller_ops lgm_nand_controller_ops {
>> +	.attach_chip = lgm_nand_attach_chip,
>> +	.exec_op = lgm_nand_exec_op,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void lgm_dma_exit(struct lgm_nand_host *lgm_host)
> lgm_dma_cleanup()?
Noted, will update the function name
>> +{
>> +	if (lgm_host->dma_rx) {
>> +		dma_release_channel(lgm_host->dma_rx);
>> +		lgm_host->dma_rx = NULL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (lgm_host->dma_tx) {
>> +		dma_release_channel(lgm_host->dma_tx);
>> +		lgm_host->dma_tx = NULL;
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int lgm_dma_init(struct device *dev, struct lgm_nand_host *lgm_host)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	/* Prepare for TX DMA: */
>> +	lgm_host->dma_tx = dma_request_chan(dev, "tx");
>> +	if (IS_ERR(lgm_host->dma_tx)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(lgm_host->dma_tx);
>> +		dev_err(dev, "can't get the TX DMA channel, error %d!\n", ret);
>> +		goto err;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Prepare for RX: */
>> +	lgm_host->dma_rx = dma_request_chan(dev, "rx");
> Hm, too bad there's not devm_ version for that one.
>
>> +	if (IS_ERR(lgm_host->dma_rx)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(lgm_host->dma_rx);
>> +		dev_err(dev, "can't get the RX DMA channel, error %d\n", ret);
>> +		goto err;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +err:
> No need for an error path if you just return the error code. BTW, I
> don't like those functions that don't cleanup behind them when an error
> happens. I know it's all handled in the dma_exit() function, but still.
okay, will return error code and also cleanup.
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int lgm_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +	struct lgm_nand_host *lgm_host;
>> +	struct nand_chip *nand;
>> +	phys_addr_t nandaddr_pa;
>> +	struct mtd_info *mtd;
>> +	struct resource *res;
>> +	int ret;
>> +	u32 cs;
>> +
>> +	lgm_host = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*lgm_host), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!lgm_host)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	lgm_host->dev = dev;
>> +	nand_controller_init(&lgm_host->controller);
>> +
>> +	lgm_host->lgm_va =
>> +	devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "lgmnand");
> 	lgm_host->lgm_va = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev,
> 								  "lgmnand");
>
>> +	if (IS_ERR(lgm_host->lgm_va))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(lgm_host->lgm_va);
>> +
>> +	lgm_host->hsnand_va =
>> +	devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "hsnand");
>> +	if (IS_ERR(lgm_host->hsnand_va))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(lgm_host->hsnand_va);
>> +
>> +	ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "nand,cs", &cs);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to get chip select: %d\n", ret);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	lgm_host->cs = cs;
>> +
>> +	lgm_host->cs_name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "nand_cs%d", cs);
> You don't need to keep the cs_name attached to lgm_host as it's
> automatically release. You can just get rid of the lgm_host->cs_name
> field.
Good point for me to update, Thanks!
>> +	if (IS_ERR(lgm_host->cs_name)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(lgm_host->cs_name);
>> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to get chip select name: %d\n", ret);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	res = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, lgm_host->cs_name);
>> +	lgm_host->nandaddr_va = res;
>> +	nandaddr_pa = res->start;
>> +	if (IS_ERR(lgm_host->nandaddr_va))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(lgm_host->nandaddr_va);
>> +
>> +	lgm_host->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(lgm_host->clk)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(lgm_host->clk);
>> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to get clock: %d\n", ret);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(lgm_host->clk);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to enable clock: %d\n", ret);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +	lgm_host->clk_rate = clk_get_rate(lgm_host->clk);
>> +
>> +	ret = lgm_dma_init(dev, lgm_host);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto disable_clk;
>> +
>> +	writel(lower_32_bits(nandaddr_pa) | LGM_ADDR_SEL_REGEN | LGM_ADDR_MASK,
>> +	       lgm_host->lgm_va + LGM_ADDR_SEL(cs));
>> +
>> +	writel(LGM_BUSCON_CMULT_V4 | LGM_BUSCON_RECOVC(1) |
>> +	       LGM_BUSCON_HOLDC(1) | LGM_BUSCON_WAITRDC(2) |
>> +	       LGM_BUSCON_WAITWRC(2) | LGM_BUSCON_BCGEN_CS | LGM_BUSCON_ALEC |
>> +	       LGM_BUSCON_SETUP_EN, lgm_host->lgm_va + LGM_BUSCON(cs));
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * NAND physical address selection is based on the chip select
>> +	 * and written to ADDR_SEL register to get Memory Region Base address.
>> +	 * FPI Bus addresses are compared to this base address in conjunction
>> +	 * with the mask control. Driver need to program this field!
>> +	 * Address: 0x17400 if chip select is CS_0
>> +	 * Address: 0x17C00 if chip select is CS_1
>> +	 * Refer the Intel LGM SoC datasheet.
>> +	 */
>> +	writel(0x17400051, lgm_host->lgm_va + LGM_ADDR_SEL(0));
>> +	writel(0x17C00051, lgm_host->lgm_va + LGM_ADDR_SEL(cs));
> No magic value please. I guess the 0x51 at the end encode some flags, so
> please describe those fields and come with a macro to generate the base
> range value (or a mapping table).
sure, will add MACRO instead of magic values.
>> +	nand_set_flash_node(&lgm_host->chip, dev->of_node);
>> +	mtd = nand_to_mtd(&lgm_host->chip);
>> +	mtd->dev.parent = dev;
>> +	lgm_host->dev = dev;
>> +
>> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lgm_host);
>> +	nand_set_controller_data(&lgm_host->chip, lgm_host);
>> +
>> +	nand = &lgm_host->chip;
>> +	nand->controller = &lgm_host->controller;
>> +	nand->controller->ops = &lgm_nand_controller_ops;
>> +
>> +	/* Scan to find existence of the device */
>> +	ret = nand_scan(&lgm_host->chip, 1);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto exit_dma;
>> +
>> +	ret = mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto clean_nand;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +clean_nand:
>> +	nand_cleanup(&lgm_host->chip);
>> +exit_dma:
>> +	lgm_dma_exit(lgm_host);
>> +disable_clk:
>> +	clk_disable_unprepare(lgm_host->clk);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int lgm_nand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct lgm_nand_host *lgm_host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +
>> +	nand_release(&lgm_host->chip);
> Can you use mtd_device_unregister() + nand_cleanup() instead, and check
> their return value?
Sure, will use .
>> +	clk_disable_unprepare(lgm_host->clk);
>> +	lgm_dma_exit(lgm_host);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id lgm_nand_match[] = {
>> +	{ .compatible = "intel,lgm-nand", },
>> +	{}
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, lgm_nand_match);
> You probably have a missing "depends on OF" in your Kconfig.
okay , Noted.
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver lgm_nand_driver = {
>> +	.probe = lgm_nand_probe,
>> +	.remove = lgm_nand_remove,
>> +	.driver = {
>> +		.name = "intel-lgm-nand",
>> +		.of_match_table = lgm_nand_match,
>> +	},
>> +
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(lgm_nand_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Vadivel Murugan R <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@intel.com>");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel's LGM External Bus NAND Controller driver");
> I didn't review the DMA and ECC aspects yet, but I think you have enough
> things to address for a v3.

Thanks a lot for the review comments and valuable inputs to me for 
further driver patch preparation.

Regards
Vadviel