From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261DEC49ED6 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D542084F for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729640AbfIKR1T (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:27:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43712 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728897AbfIKR1S (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:27:18 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97A4307D945; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.176.1] (ovpn-64-2.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.64.2]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E7805D9E2; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:27:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Benjamin Coddington" To: "Chuck Lever" Cc: "Jason L Tibbitts III" , "Bruce Fields" , "Wolfgang Walter" , "Linux NFS Mailing List" , km@cm4all.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Regression in 5.1.20: Reading long directory fails Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:27:17 -0400 Message-ID: <7D8C7BBD-8266-4A5A-9C95-0C8B57C10333@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <429B2B1F-FB55-46C5-8BC5-7644CE9A5894@redhat.com> References: <4418877.15LTP4gqqJ@stwm.de> <4198657.JbNDGbLXiX@h2o.as.studentenwerk.mhn.de> <20190906144837.GD17204@fieldses.org> <75F810C6-E99E-40C3-B5E1-34BA2CC42773@oracle.com> <0089DF80-3A1C-4F0B-A200-28FF7CFD0C65@oracle.com> <429B2B1F-FB55-46C5-8BC5-7644CE9A5894@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.48]); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11 Sep 2019, at 13:26, Benjamin Coddington wrote: > On 11 Sep 2019, at 12:39, Chuck Lever wrote: > >>> On Sep 11, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Benjamin Coddington >>> wrote: >>> > >>> Instead, I think we want to make sure the mic falls squarely into >>> the tail >>> every time. >> >> I'm not clear how you could do that. The length of the page data is >> not >> known to the client before it parses the reply. Are you suggesting >> that >> gss_unwrap should do it somehow? > > Is it too niave to always put the mic at the end of the tail? Naive, even..? Ben