From: Javier Gonzalez <javier@cnexlabs.com>
To: "Matias Bjørling" <mb@lightnvm.io>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@cnexlabs.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] lightnvm: pblk: add support for chunk metadata on erase
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 09:16:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7FBEB635-C943-484D-A970-D3BF870BAFFB@cnexlabs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71f5f8b3-66d5-a0e0-85ab-cb22e5ac621c@lightnvm.io>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1804 bytes --]
> On 31 Aug 2018, at 15.57, Matias Bjørling <mb@lightnvm.io> wrote:
>
> On 08/31/2018 03:34 PM, Javier González wrote:
>> Matias,
>> This patchset implements support for retrieving chunk metadata when
>> submitting a reset/erase command. Patches 0 and 1 are small fixes that
>> can be directly merged into your patch:
>> lightnvm: move bad block and chunk state logic to core
>> Also, note that these do not apply on top of your for-4.20/core due them
>> depending on patches that I sent before that you have not picked up yet.
>> You can see them though in for-4.20/pblk. I'll rebase as patches in the
>> list appear in your tree.
>
> Thanks. It is really confusing when you guys maintains an implicit order and posts the patches separately. I will appreciate that patches that are related are posted together, such that I don't have to manually track what comes before another. That makes it less of a pain for me to keep track of and we can keep the reviews together.
>
> This is the patches that I have in the pipeline (from before the e-mails from today):
>
> - This serie - Pending review
> - Serie: pblk: support variable OOB size - Waiting on review from Igor
> - lightnvm: pblk: recover open lines on 2.0 devices. Which doesn't apply due to the fixes to the pad distance patch.
>
Yes, I know and I apologize - we should have a better flow. What do you
say that for windows like this, where we have a number of patches that
have dependencies that we post them in meaningful patchsets and point to
a branch where they are ordered, like in a PR? Then we can rebase and
propagate changes properly?
For this window, I'll rebase the rest of the patches in for-4.20/pblk on
top of your for-4.20/core, then we can propagate changes as they come.
Javier
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-03 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-31 13:34 [PATCH 0/4] lightnvm: pblk: add support for chunk metadata on erase Javier González
2018-08-31 13:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] lightnvm: use right address format on 1.2 path Javier González
2018-08-31 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] lightnvm: assign block address before slba Javier González
2018-09-04 10:09 ` Matias Bjørling
2018-08-31 13:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] lightnvm: pblk: add helper for printing chunk state Javier González
2018-08-31 13:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] lightnvm: pblk: retrieve chunk metadata on erase Javier González
2018-08-31 13:57 ` [PATCH 0/4] lightnvm: pblk: add support for " Matias Bjørling
2018-09-03 9:16 ` Javier Gonzalez [this message]
2018-09-04 9:54 ` Matias Bjørling
2018-09-04 17:16 ` Javier Gonzalez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7FBEB635-C943-484D-A970-D3BF870BAFFB@cnexlabs.com \
--to=javier@cnexlabs.com \
--cc=hans.holmberg@cnexlabs.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@lightnvm.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).