From: Alex Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr> To: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>, linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PUD/PGDIR entries for linear mapping Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 02:51:18 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <7ad7057e-fdab-14ef-9bdb-c77ccefd208a@ghiti.fr> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAOnJCUJSKvLDsXC8+wyO1xsZDzLJmjY2kwMKhjz0t+uS8h0pDw@mail.gmail.com> Hi Atish, Le 6/10/20 à 2:32 PM, Atish Patra a écrit : > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 8:36 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr> wrote: >> This small patchset intends to use PUD/PGDIR entries for linear mapping >> in order to better utilize TLB. >> >> At the moment, only PMD entries can be used since on common platforms >> (qemu/unleashed), the kernel is loaded at DRAM + 2MB which dealigns virtual >> and physical addresses and then prevents the use of PUD/PGDIR entries. >> So the kernel must be able to get those 2MB for PAGE_OFFSET to map the >> beginning of the DRAM: this is achieved in patch 1. >> > I don't have in depth knowledge of how mm code works so this question > may be a completely > stupid one :). Just for my understanding, > As per my understanding, kernel will map those 2MB of memory but never use it. > How does the kernel ensure that it doesn't allocate any memory from those 2MB > memory if it is not marked as reserved? Yes, a 1GB hugepage will cover those 2MB: I rely on the previous boot stage to mark this region as reserved if there is something there (like opensbi). Otherwise, the kernel will indeed try to allocate memory from there :) Alex >> But furthermore, at the moment, the firmware (opensbi) explicitly asks the >> kernel not to map the region it occupies, which is on those common >> platforms at the very beginning of the DRAM and then it also dealigns >> virtual and physical addresses. I proposed a patch here: >> >> https://github.com/riscv/opensbi/pull/167 >> >> that removes this 'constraint' but *not* all the time as it offers some >> kind of protection in case PMP is not available. So sometimes, we may >> have a part of the memory below the kernel that is removed creating a >> misalignment between virtual and physical addresses. So for performance >> reasons, we must at least make sure that PMD entries can be used: that >> is guaranteed by patch 1 too. >> >> Finally the second patch simply improves best_map_size so that whenever >> possible, PUD/PGDIR entries are used. >> >> Below is the kernel page table without this patch on a 6G platform: >> >> ---[ Linear mapping ]--- >> 0xffffc00000000000-0xffffc00176e00000 0x0000000080200000 5998M PMD D A . . . W R V >> >> And with this patchset + opensbi patch: >> >> ---[ Linear mapping ]--- >> 0xffffc00000000000-0xffffc00140000000 0x0000000080000000 5G PUD D A . . . W R V >> 0xffffc00140000000-0xffffc00177000000 0x00000001c0000000 880M PMD D A . . . W R V >> >> Alexandre Ghiti (2): >> riscv: Get memory below load_pa while ensuring linear mapping is PMD >> aligned >> riscv: Use PUD/PGDIR entries for linear mapping when possible >> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h | 8 ++++ >> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.20.1 >> >> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-11 6:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-06-03 15:36 Alexandre Ghiti 2020-06-03 15:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] riscv: Get memory below load_pa while ensuring linear mapping is PMD aligned Alexandre Ghiti 2020-06-03 15:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] riscv: Use PUD/PGDIR entries for linear mapping when possible Alexandre Ghiti 2020-06-19 0:47 ` Atish Patra 2020-06-19 4:28 ` Alex Ghiti 2020-06-19 18:16 ` Atish Patra 2020-06-20 9:04 ` Alex Ghiti 2020-06-21 9:39 ` Alex Ghiti 2020-06-22 19:11 ` Atish Patra 2020-06-29 14:42 ` Alex Ghiti 2020-06-10 18:32 ` [PATCH 0/2] PUD/PGDIR entries for linear mapping Atish Patra 2020-06-11 6:51 ` Alex Ghiti [this message] 2020-06-11 17:29 ` Atish Patra 2020-06-12 12:59 ` Alex Ghiti 2020-06-12 13:17 ` Alex Ghiti 2020-06-12 17:43 ` Atish Patra 2020-06-15 5:35 ` Alex Ghiti 2020-06-16 21:52 ` Atish Patra 2020-06-29 14:46 ` Alex Ghiti
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=7ad7057e-fdab-14ef-9bdb-c77ccefd208a@ghiti.fr \ --to=alex@ghiti.fr \ --cc=Atish.Patra@wdc.com \ --cc=anup@brainfault.org \ --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \ --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH 0/2] PUD/PGDIR entries for linear mapping' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).