From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F14BC433E0 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1EE64DD8 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231984AbhA1KUi (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 05:20:38 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45996 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231467AbhA1KU3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 05:20:29 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com (mail-wm1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6712FC061573; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 02:19:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id 190so3847385wmz.0; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 02:19:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RCvbfOIW3W6+aeDvZc0GOFXEO64imNVS6UzVUBooVvA=; b=gDH+qqevZvp+YOTzuVNfH/WWzmLLtKA02Ef0OixWBJS9dL8ZayTkiDoP5o2D9f2EP6 cCPLwlEc7wJZmlWzuc3XUxB8WXh5Tyv2IxBPDbWY1mzr8bCJU3VEweBkLnmyX4oN0J9E 77szUfS9PU51+nZlO/74WZBGMtxogZAsG/oY+Lo4uHcqV9QOAWOs/Zve+L2jY6/CQAcd gyMxKtw402tBi3+vbnaF3BqeobtyK2dHfnyzApou2RAbzSBmulmM8pqpyJ9uxwD0lfxa iHaI3sdKDycgkHYebIXRCnt/W5ACJmHCfEVm34AQ/nqyYEjKzfCQgoCSEhr5q8KdviR8 gcMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RCvbfOIW3W6+aeDvZc0GOFXEO64imNVS6UzVUBooVvA=; b=gX+3cItMRFUV30RP6M2JDAf7G/iXyRl+jAoHlH7vni5DRkTrB1z4fOQ4+DDpLe90xf IbDTGLrmZcK6ZFCR2QmP1kD7kjwLh+kppG9qmRsh4ubZ7FjN1IBTUPW0SuSWWIkmo/5K 2BYCkpYHJ3W9UgT3bRzaS/t4gUy+C6yybMX27SQdPSQ4qNlGeZNYkXFFmpbVXzfdtKzE TQGa79G18Btw9TGw2tFufA7PZqfu2dfHXqjiAEohATcTJpbqvhGmM4paZL6TRCO1uguW ugJoHA411VzXdXdk3+ICYY1eS/5BOa60QkpIquieWH79cO2WM5TMtUWXZXfYiCPRKGLU NNVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533VqT2Ir5WEnBGk4UevnxeH7gs3O6bC8ZwaEGHC+N+HrsdtI+/N W9y99jnF3HS4km+8nAozznyTa+6CRCg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJya78+1iHpwjhDOcKpysAKfE75nsJFoAa7lIRekMjsv0tA0yHfR22bgt11xuP25wrph+IQz/Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:21c1:: with SMTP id x1mr8365797wmj.48.1611829186171; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 02:19:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.21] ([195.245.17.255]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e11sm6275009wrx.14.2021.01.28.02.19.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 02:19:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7b932babfe5ad5756eed70effe32bdc03b901d84.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] gpio: ep93xx: fixes series patch From: Alexander Sverdlin To: Linus Walleij , Nikita Shubin Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Bartosz Golaszewski , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:19:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20201228150052.2633-1-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> <20210127104617.1173-1-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Linus, On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 22:54 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > Series of patches to fix ep93xx gpio driver to make IRQ's working. > > > > The following are fix patches (these are enough to get gpio-ep93xx > > working with modern kernel): > > I see that there is a strange level of attention to patches to this > platform! > > Since you fix all my mistakes made in converting this driver > in the past I will just say: > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > > For all of them. > > There are some nitpicks from the reviewers to fix up but > overall this looks very very good. as we don't have a dedicated EP93xx tree, would you like to take the series in one of your trees? -- Alexander Sverdlin.