From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51955C41604 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 08:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074C02078E for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 08:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="WoTEI/RB" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726643AbgJFIOV (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2020 04:14:21 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:35330 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726006AbgJFIOU (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2020 04:14:20 -0400 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0968E6mu093407; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 03:14:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1601972046; bh=R+hYz0n1bmLNJQrANIRZOfjNkI2Oo7acRkOE16iJCMg=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=WoTEI/RBcFFGd7bW+IIZstsZfzN0qZSoWPIP/solb6kWdPY9BN3diCKvnAwWNpW/K EiQ1r4ldeQbP85R3TaSa6pTmQUoNaN8i0d3EPWio7fWCMo6FvmMHhDIVRJUzJhgHrV BDalHpVl1Ka03TdHDXao4D4kK2pUXYp0WDhBy6Es= Received: from DFLE103.ent.ti.com (dfle103.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.24]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0968E6Nh016473 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 6 Oct 2020 03:14:06 -0500 Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) by DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 03:14:05 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 03:14:05 -0500 Received: from [10.250.232.88] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0968E2pN018962; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 03:14:03 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Enable GPIO and I2C configs for TI's J721e platform To: Nishanth Menon CC: , , , , References: <20201002164535.9920-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com> <20201002170211.ghzbjqt6nti6mssh@attakatha> From: Faiz Abbas Message-ID: <7c45f8e1-afc7-b386-fddb-29d44326067c@ti.com> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 13:44:01 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201002170211.ghzbjqt6nti6mssh@attakatha> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nishanth, On 02/10/20 10:32 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 22:15-20201002, Faiz Abbas wrote: >> The following patches enable configs in the arm64 defconfig to support >> GPIO and I2C support on TI's J721e platform. >> >> Faiz Abbas (2): >> arm64: defconfig: Enable OMAP I2C driver >> arm64: defconfig: Enable DAVINCI_GPIO driver >> >> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > Could we do an audit and make sure nothing else is missing - Say ALSA / > DRM or something else? I'm not aware of anything that might be missing. That said, I am not aware of every single config in every subsystem. IMO the various driver owners should be responsible for adding their configs to defconfig. > > And I don't really see the need to split these into individual patches, > maybe, take a hint from [1] > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200630171500.11438-1-geert+renesas@glider.be/ > Sounds good. I'll squash into a single patch and repost. Thanks, Faiz